2003 World Weightlifting Championships – Women's +75 kg
The 2003 World Weightlifting Championships were held in Vancouver, Canada from 14 November to 22 November. The women's +75 kilograms division was staged on 20 and 21 November 2003.
| 2003 World Weightlifting Championships | ||
|---|---|---|
 | ||
| Men | Women | |
| 56 kg | 48 kg | |
| 62 kg | 53 kg | |
| 69 kg | 58 kg | |
| 77 kg | 63 kg | |
| 85 kg | 69 kg | |
| 94 kg | 75 kg | |
| 105 kg | +75 kg | |
| +105 kg | ||
Schedule
| Date | Time | Event |
|---|---|---|
| 20 November 2003 | 16:00 | Group C |
| 21 November 2003 | 12:30 | Group B |
| 17:30 | Group A |
Medalists
| Event | Gold | Silver | Bronze | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snatch |  | 137.5 kg |  | 130.0 kg |  | 125.0 kg |
| Clean & Jerk | | 162.5 kg | | 160.0 kg | .svg.png){kind=small} | 157.5 kg |
| Total | | 300.0 kg | | 290.0 kg | | 277.5 kg |
Records
Prior to this competition, the existing world records were as follows.
| World Record | Snatch | | 135.0 kg | Sydney, Australia | 22 September 2000 |
| Clean & Jerk | | 168.5 kg | Hyderabad, India | 31 October 2003 | |
| Total | | 300.0 kg | Sydney, Australia | 22 September 2000 |
Results
| Rank | Athlete | Group | Body weight | Snatch (kg) | Clean & Jerk (kg) | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | Rank | 1 | 2 | 3 | Rank | |||||
 | | A | 101.54 | 130.0 | 135.5 | 137.5 | | 160.0 | 162.5 | | 300.0 | |
 | | A | 103.73 | 130.0 | | 150.0 | 155.0 | 160.0 | | 290.0 | ||
 | | A | 152.08 | 115.0 | 120.0 | 125.0 | | 145.0 | 150.0 | 152.5 | 5 | 277.5 |
| 4 |  | A | 94.67 | 115.0 | 120.0 | 5 | 145.0 | 150.0 | 152.5 | 4 | 272.5 | |
| 5 | | A | 107.66 | 115.0 | 10 | 152.5 | 157.5 | | 272.5 | |||
| 6 |  | A | 94.22 | 117.5 | 122.5 | 4 | 142.5 | 147.5 | 7 | 270.0 | ||
| 7 |  | A | 116.42 | 120.0 | 6 | 150.0 | 6 | 270.0 | ||||
| 8 | | B | 88.45 | 112.5 | 117.5 | 7 | 135.0 | 142.5 | 145.0 | 8 | 262.5 | |
| 9 |  | A | 119.00 | 112.5 | 117.5 | 8 | 137.5 | 142.5 | 10 | 260.0 | ||
| 10 | .svg.png){kind=small} | A | 91.73 | 110.0 | 115.0 | 9 | 135.0 | 140.0 | 11 | 255.0 | ||
| 11 |  | A | 96.29 | 105.0 | 110.0 | 11 | 142.5 | 9 | 252.5 | |||
| 12 |  | B | 94.58 | 100.0 | 105.0 | 15 | 125.0 | 135.0 | 140.0 | 12 | 245.0 | |
| 13 | | B | 100.44 | 102.5 | 107.5 | 12 | 125.0 | 130.0 | 15 | 237.5 | ||
| 14 |  | B | 96.71 | 100.0 | 105.0 | 16 | 130.0 | 14 | 235.0 | |||
| 15 |  | C | 75.46 | 97.5 | 102.5 | 105.0 | 13 | 115.0 | 120.0 | 122.5 | 17 | 227.5 |
| 16 |  | B | 95.63 | 95.0 | 22 | 125.0 | 130.0 | 132.5 | 13 | 227.5 | ||
| 17 |  | B | 80.45 | 97.5 | 102.5 | 17 | 122.5 | 19 | 225.0 | |||
| 18 |  | B | 112.24 | 97.5 | 100.0 | 19 | 117.5 | 120.0 | 122.5 | 21 | 222.5 | |
| 19 | .svg.png){kind=small} | C | 77.88 | 95.0 | 21 | 115.0 | 120.0 | 122.5 | 18 | 217.5 | ||
| 20 | .svg.png){kind=small} | C | 114.98 | 90.0 | 95.0 | 23 | 122.5 | 22 | 217.5 | |||
| 21 |  | B | 137.42 | 90.0 | 95.0 | 24 | 122.5 | 23 | 217.5 | |||
| 22 | | C | 77.18 | 97.5 | 100.0 | 18 | 110.0 | 115.0 | 25 | 215.0 | ||
| 23 |  | B | 89.86 | 97.5 | 20 | 117.5 | 24 | 215.0 | ||||
| 24 |  | C | 111.03 | 80.0 | 85.0 | 87.5 | 26 | 115.0 | 122.5 | 20 | 210.0 | |
| 25 | | C | 101.36 | 85.0 | 90.0 | 25 | 110.0 | 27 | 200.0 | |||
| 26 |  | C | 98.27 | 75.0 | 80.0 | 27 | 102.5 | 110.0 | 26 | 190.0 | ||
| 27 | .svg.png){kind=small} | C | 110.65 | 80.0 | 28 | 100.0 | 105.0 | 107.5 | 28 | 187.5 | ||
| — | | C | 75.38 | — | 115.0 | 122.5 | 16 | — | ||||
| — |  | B | 76.90 | 100.0 | 105.0 | 14 | — | — | ||||
| — |  | C | 87.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||
New records
| Snatch | 135.5 kg | |
WR |
| 137.5 kg | |
WR |
gollark: Interesting. I don't actually know much about history, though.
gollark: I haven't killed *any* socialist leaders recently.
gollark: What do I have to do with this?
gollark: It probably wouldn't actually do much to terrorists/child predators/whatever unless they continued to use them despite this, which would be stupid, but would compromise everyone else's security and increase government power substantially.
gollark: What seems to actually be desired is to mandate backdoors in all the popular end to end encrypted chat things, which *is* probably possible, but which would be very bad.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.