2003 Tata Open – Singles

Guillermo Cañas was the defending champion but lost in the quarterfinals to Karol Kučera.

Singles
2003 Tata Open
Champion Paradorn Srichaphan
Runner-up Karol Kučera
Final score6–3, 6–1

Paradorn Srichaphan won in the final 6–3, 6–1 against Kučera.

Seeds
  1. Guillermo Cañas (Quarterfinals)
  2. Paradorn Srichaphan (Champion)
  3. Sjeng Schalken (withdrew because of a wrist injury)
  4. Juan Ignacio Chela (Semifinals)
  5. Andrei Pavel (First Round)
  6. Rainer Schüttler (Quarterfinals)
  7. Lars Burgsmüller (First Round)
  8. Albert Montañés (Second Round)

Draw

Key

Finals
Semifinals Final
          
  Karol Kučera 6 7
4 Juan Ignacio Chela 3 5
  Karol Kučera 3 1
2 Paradorn Srichaphan 6 6
  Jean-René Lisnard 2 1
2 Paradorn Srichaphan 6 6

Top Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 G Cañas 4 6 6
  D Norman 6 2 3 1 G Cañas 6 6  
WC P Amritraj 2 2     J Vaněk 4 2  
  J Vaněk 6 6   1 G Cañas 1 5  
  J Gimelstob 6 63 3   K Kučera 6 7  
  K Kučera 3 77 6   K Kučera 78 3 6
  C Mamiit 6 6     C Mamiit 66 6 3
7 L Burgsmüller 0 3     K Kučera 6 7  
4 J I Chela 77 7   4 J I Chela 3 5  
WC L Paes 65 5   4 J I Chela 3 6 2
WC R Bopanna 4 63     Ž Krajan 6 3 0r
  Ž Krajan 6 77   4 J I Chela 6 6  
  J Golmard 1r   Q T Behrend 4 3  
  A Portas 1       A Portas 64 1  
Q T Behrend 6 6   Q T Behrend 77 6  
5 A Pavel 3 3  

Bottom Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
6 R Schüttler 6 6  
  J Knowle 4 1   6 R Schüttler 6 6  
Q M Kohlmann 63 3     M Philippoussis 2 1  
  M Philippoussis 77 6   6 R Schüttler 2 5  
  K Pless 2 5     J-R Lisnard 6 7  
  J-R Lisnard 6 7     J-R Lisnard 6 2 6
  J Balcells 5 4   LL N Okun 0 6 2
LL N Okun 7 6     J-R Lisnard 2 1  
8 A Montañés 77 1 6 2 P Srichaphan 6 6  
  M Llodra 65 6 4 8 A Montañés 4 3  
Q J Varlet 1 5     S Sargsian 6 6  
  S Sargsian 6 7     S Sargsian 4 4  
  J van Lottum 6 77   2 P Srichaphan 6 6  
Q O Patience 2 64     J van Lottum 2 4  
  J Vacek 5 2   2 P Srichaphan 6 6  
2 P Srichaphan 7 6  
gollark: But comparing memory locations is... not useful?
gollark: A mere implementation detail.
gollark: I mean, Eq *maybe*, although it's dubious as functions can't easily be shown to be equal, but *Ord*?!
gollark: *Why* do they implement Ord?
gollark: It SHOULD probably maybe.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.