2003–04 UHL season
The 2003–04 United Hockey League season was the 13th season of the United Hockey League (Colonial Hockey League before 1997), a North American minor professional league. 12 teams participated in the regular season and the Muskegon Fury won the league title.
| 2003–04 UHL season | |
|---|---|
| Champions | Muskegon Fury |
Regular season
| Eastern Division | GP | W | L | T | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richmond RiverDogs | 76 | 44 | 27 | 5 | 259 | 251 | 93 |
| Flint Generals | 76 | 39 | 27 | 10 | 253 | 244 | 88 |
| Port Huron Beacons | 76 | 38 | 31 | 7 | 269 | 269 | 83 |
| Elmira Jackals | 76 | 33 | 34 | 9 | 238 | 256 | 75 |
| Adirondack IceHawks | 76 | 22 | 44 | 10 | 210 | 303 | 54 |
| Columbus Stars | 34 | 19 | 11 | 4 | 102 | 93 | 42 |
| Western Division | GP | W | L | T | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fort Wayne Komets | 76 | 53 | 17 | 6 | 281 | 180 | 112 |
| Quad City Mallards | 76 | 50 | 20 | 6 | 287 | 220 | 106 |
| Muskegon Fury | 76 | 47 | 20 | 9 | 298 | 239 | 103 |
| Kalamazoo Wings | 76 | 45 | 22 | 9 | 281 | 207 | 99 |
| Rockford IceHogs | 76 | 28 | 43 | 5 | 215 | 294 | 61 |
| Missouri River Otters | 76 | 17 | 51 | 8 | 191 | 328 | 42 |
Colonial Cup-Playoffs
| Colonial Cup-Quarterfinals | Colonial Cup-Semifinals | Colonial Cup-Final | ||||||||||||
| E2 | Flint Generals | 0 | ||||||||||||
| E3 | Port Huron Beacons | 3 | ||||||||||||
| E3 | Port Huron Beacons | 2 | ||||||||||||
| Eastern Division | ||||||||||||||
| E4 | Elmira Jackals | 4 | ||||||||||||
| E1 | Richmond RiverDogs | 1 | ||||||||||||
| E4 | Elmira Jackals | 3 | ||||||||||||
| E4 | Elmira Jackals | 0 | ||||||||||||
| W3 | Muskegon Fury | 4 | ||||||||||||
| W1 | Fort Wayne Komets | 3 | ||||||||||||
| W4 | Kalamazoo Wings | 2 | ||||||||||||
| W1 | Fort Wayne Komets | 0 | ||||||||||||
| Western Division | ||||||||||||||
| W3 | Muskegon Fury | 4 | ||||||||||||
| W2 | Quad City Mallards | 0 | ||||||||||||
| W3 | Muskegon Fury | 3 | ||||||||||||
gollark: I mean, that's not a thing of *keywords*, just of... more language features, really.
gollark: More keywords → more complexity in the language/parsing/whatever, more stuff programmers have to know.
gollark: For all (values of) f there exists a (value) g such that f (x, y) = (g x) y. In other words, you can convert any function which takes two values as a tuple or something to a curried one. I think.
gollark: I knew it would eventually be useful setting that as my status!
gollark: What part of ∀f ∃g (f (x,y) = (g x) y) did you not understand?
External links
- Season 2003/04 on hockeydb.com
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.