2002 Superettan
Season | 2002 |
---|---|
Champions | Öster |
Promoted |
|
Relegated | |
Matches played | 240 |
← 2001 2003 → |
Statistics of Superettan in season 2002.
Overview
It was contested by 16 teams, and Östers IF won the championship.
League table
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Promotion, qualification or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Östers IF (C, P) | 30 | 16 | 6 | 8 | 61 | 35 | +26 | 54 | Promotion to Allsvenskan |
2 | Enköpings SK (P) | 30 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 55 | 43 | +12 | 52 | |
3 | Västra Frölunda | 30 | 14 | 9 | 7 | 54 | 33 | +21 | 51 | Qualification to Promotion playoffs |
4 | BK Häcken | 30 | 14 | 9 | 7 | 52 | 33 | +19 | 51 | |
5 | Assyriska FF | 30 | 12 | 9 | 9 | 36 | 27 | +9 | 45 | |
6 | Café Opera United | 30 | 12 | 8 | 10 | 48 | 45 | +3 | 44 | |
7 | IFK Malmö | 30 | 12 | 6 | 12 | 34 | 34 | 0 | 42 | |
8 | Västerås SK | 30 | 12 | 5 | 13 | 49 | 49 | 0 | 41 | |
9 | Trelleborgs FF | 30 | 10 | 9 | 11 | 42 | 41 | +1 | 39 | |
10 | Åtvidabergs FF | 30 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 31 | 50 | −19 | 37 | |
11 | Gefle IF | 30 | 9 | 8 | 13 | 45 | 47 | −2 | 35 | |
12 | IF Brommapojkarna | 30 | 9 | 8 | 13 | 40 | 52 | −12 | 35 | |
13 | IF Sylvia | 30 | 9 | 8 | 13 | 37 | 55 | −18 | 35 | |
14 | IK Brage (R) | 30 | 8 | 10 | 12 | 49 | 55 | −6 | 34 | Relegation to Division 2 |
15 | Ängelholms FF (R) | 30 | 9 | 7 | 14 | 29 | 45 | −16 | 34 | |
16 | Mjällby AIF (R) | 30 | 8 | 5 | 17 | 42 | 60 | −18 | 29 |
Source: svenskfotboll.se
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(C) Champion; (P) Promoted; (R) Relegated.
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(C) Champion; (P) Promoted; (R) Relegated.
Season statistics
Top scorers
|
Top assists
|
Footnotes
- "Skytteliga". The Swedish Football Association. The Swedish Football Association. Retrieved 11 April 2012.
- "Passningsliga". The Swedish Football Association. The Swedish Football Association. Retrieved 11 April 2012.
gollark: You can probably break an accidentally-doing-silly-stuff one by making its API key not work, but not a deliberately-doing-bad-stuff-one.
gollark: If it's just spamming viewpages, that's not API-based.
gollark: They could probably be banned by IP anyway.
gollark: That's not an API thing, I'm fairly sure.
gollark: Anyway, anyone who would create loads for no reason could now do so if they asked for an API key.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.