2001–02 Midland Football Alliance
The 2001–02 Midland Football Alliance season was the eighth in the history of Midland Football Alliance, a football competition in England.
Season | 2001–02 |
---|---|
Champions | Stourbridge |
Promoted | Bromsgrove Rovers |
Matches played | 462 |
Goals scored | 1,365 (2.95 per match) |
← 2000–01 2002–03 → |
Clubs
The league featured 18 clubs from the previous season, along with five new clubs:
- Bromsgrove Rovers, relegated from the Southern Football League
- Ludlow Town, promoted from the West Midlands (Regional) League
- Paget Rangers, relegated from the Southern Football League
- Quorn, promoted from the Leicestershire Senior League
- Studley B K L, promoted from the Midland Football Combination
League table
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Promotion or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Stourbridge | 42 | 27 | 7 | 8 | 82 | 39 | +43 | 88 | |
2 | Bromsgrove Rovers | 42 | 26 | 9 | 7 | 94 | 41 | +53 | 87 | Promoted to the Southern Football League |
3 | Wednesfield | 42 | 24 | 9 | 9 | 73 | 39 | +34 | 81 | |
4 | Stratford Town | 42 | 24 | 7 | 11 | 81 | 49 | +32 | 79 | |
5 | Rushall Olympic | 42 | 22 | 11 | 9 | 81 | 50 | +31 | 77 | |
6 | Oadby Town | 42 | 21 | 12 | 9 | 78 | 62 | +16 | 75 | |
7 | Quorn | 42 | 20 | 10 | 12 | 76 | 55 | +21 | 70 | |
8 | Barwell | 42 | 15 | 17 | 10 | 67 | 44 | +23 | 62 | |
9 | Studley B K L | 42 | 16 | 12 | 14 | 76 | 57 | +19 | 60 | |
10 | Ludlow Town | 42 | 15 | 14 | 13 | 58 | 53 | +5 | 59 | |
11 | Bridgnorth Town | 42 | 18 | 5 | 19 | 74 | 73 | +1 | 59 | |
12 | Willenhall Town | 42 | 16 | 9 | 17 | 65 | 62 | +3 | 57 | |
13 | Boldmere St. Michaels | 42 | 15 | 11 | 16 | 43 | 51 | −8 | 56 | |
14 | Halesowen Harriers | 42 | 16 | 8 | 18 | 56 | 69 | −13 | 56 | |
15 | Paget Rangers | 42 | 10 | 19 | 13 | 58 | 55 | +3 | 49 | Club folded |
16 | Stafford Town | 42 | 13 | 6 | 23 | 59 | 88 | −29 | 45 | |
17 | Pelsall Villa | 42 | 10 | 12 | 20 | 39 | 70 | −31 | 42 | |
18 | Chasetown | 42 | 9 | 13 | 20 | 43 | 74 | −31 | 40 | |
19 | Shifnal Town | 42 | 9 | 10 | 23 | 36 | 77 | −41 | 37 | |
20 | Knypersley Victoria | 42 | 10 | 5 | 27 | 51 | 82 | −31 | 35 | |
21 | Oldbury United | 42 | 7 | 11 | 24 | 39 | 77 | −38 | 32 | |
22 | Cradley Town | 42 | 5 | 11 | 26 | 36 | 98 | −62 | 26 | |
23 | Stapenhill | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Club folded, record expunged |
Source: fchd
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
gollark: Anyway, what are the requirements for esoprophecies™?
gollark: *Being*, not pretending.
gollark: No, it was just you being stupid.
gollark: See, it would be REALLY evil-mastermind if you actually came up with a really convincing argument that Google's privacy invasion was good and convinced us. But this is just stupid.
gollark: The thing is, andrew, it makes you seem stupider in aggregate, so people consider you stupider and are less likely to think "hmm maybe he is PRETENDING".
References
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.