2000 Nottingham Open – Doubles
Patrick Galbraith and Justin Gimelstob were the defending champions, but did not partner together this year. Galbraith partnered Brian MacPhie, losing in the quarterfinals. Gimelstob partnered Jared Palmer, losing in the first round.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2000 Nottingham Open | |
Champions | |
Runners-up | |
Final score | 1–6, 6–4, 6–3 |
Donald Johnson and Piet Norval won the title, defeating Ellis Ferreira and Rick Leach 1–6, 6–4, 6–3 in the final.
Seeds
Ellis Ferreira / Rick Leach (Final) Jonas Björkman / Byron Black (First Round) Justin Gimelstob / Jared Palmer (First Round) David Adams / John-Laffnie de Jager (Semifinals)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Draw
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6 | 65 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 77 | 65 | 1 | 6 | 61 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 64 | 4 | 3 | 77 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
77 | 6 | 1 | 77 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 62 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q | 2 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 77 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 4 | 5 | 7 | 62 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 6 | 4 | 62 | 79 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6 | 77 | 67 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 6 | 3 | WC | 4 | 6 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 6 | 3 | 6 | WC | 3 | 77 | 710 | ||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 64 | 68 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 3 | 6 | 3 |
gollark: This is one of those stupid memes (in the general sense) which spreads everywhere despite being stupid.
gollark: No. Cease.
gollark: People who don't think things could be worse, or talk about how they couldn't be much worse, really underestimate maximal possible badness.
gollark: <@302628368044523520> That... is not talking about 4G/5G the telecommunications standards, but some sort of genetic thing... and I'm pretty sure people are aware that mmWave signals are absorbed by the air well. It doesn't matter.
gollark: <@302628368044523520> There are more coronavirus cases in population centers because that's where people are. There are 5G towers in population centers because that's where high enough densities of people to make 5G "useful" are. It's not complicated.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.