2000–01 Segunda Liga
The 2000–01 Segunda Liga season was the 11th season of the competition and the 67th season of recognised second-tier football in Portugal.[1] As the LPFP took over all nationwide professional leagues the competition was renamed from Segunda Divisão de Honra to Segunda Liga.
Season | 2000–01 |
---|---|
Champions | CD Santa Clara |
Promoted |
|
Relegated |
|
2001–02 → |
Overview
The league was contested by 18 teams with CD Santa Clara winning the championship and gaining promotion to the Primeira Liga along with Varzim SC and Vitória Setúbal. At the other end of the table Imortal DC, FC Marco and SC Freamunde were relegated to the Segunda Divisão.[1]
League standings
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Promotion or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Santa Clara (C, P) | 34 | 20 | 7 | 7 | 60 | 37 | +23 | 67 | Promotion to Primeira Liga |
2 | Vitória de Setúbal (P) | 34 | 19 | 7 | 8 | 64 | 41 | +23 | 64 | |
3 | Varzim (P) | 34 | 19 | 7 | 8 | 53 | 34 | +19 | 64 | |
4 | Maia | 34 | 19 | 7 | 8 | 58 | 41 | +17 | 64 | |
5 | Rio Ave | 34 | 17 | 9 | 8 | 68 | 35 | +33 | 60 | |
6 | Penafiel | 34 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 45 | 31 | +14 | 58 | |
7 | Nacional | 34 | 14 | 9 | 11 | 55 | 52 | +3 | 51 | |
8 | Académica | 34 | 14 | 6 | 14 | 51 | 48 | +3 | 48 | |
9 | Naval 1º Maio | 34 | 14 | 6 | 14 | 49 | 45 | +4 | 48 | |
10 | União de Lamas | 34 | 11 | 8 | 15 | 43 | 56 | −13 | 41 | |
11 | Ovarense | 34 | 12 | 5 | 17 | 42 | 53 | −11 | 41 | |
12 | Chaves | 34 | 9 | 14 | 11 | 48 | 44 | +4 | 41 | |
13 | Leça | 34 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 34 | 57 | −23 | 39 | |
14 | Espinho | 34 | 9 | 11 | 14 | 39 | 41 | −2 | 38 | |
15 | FC Felgueiras | 34 | 8 | 10 | 16 | 40 | 50 | −10 | 34 | |
16 | Imortal (R) | 34 | 7 | 12 | 15 | 33 | 44 | −11 | 33 | Relegation to Segunda Divisão B |
17 | Marco (R) | 34 | 9 | 6 | 19 | 39 | 66 | −27 | 33 | |
18 | Freamunde (R) | 34 | 6 | 5 | 23 | 28 | 64 | −36 | 23 |
Footnotes
- "Portugal - Table of Honor - soccerlibrary.free.fr" (PDF). Soccer Library. Retrieved 2012-04-27.
gollark: 1. screening of ideas in advance doesn't mean they'll have clean/good code2. people won't make hatcheries constantly for no reason3. yes, badly programmed ones might do stupid amounts of requests, but people will say "this is slow, avoid it"4. there would be few enough that TJ09 can complain at people who do it wrong - or just add rate-limiting
gollark: That does seem kind of unlikely.
gollark: The fact that login does require some signup in advance for the return URL and all that?
gollark: Slightly more precise time-of-death?
gollark: Well, explain and *I* might join in if you have a good explanation.
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.