1996 Warsaw Cup by Heros – Doubles
Sandra Cecchini and Laura Garrone were the defending champions but only Garrone competed that year with Alexandra Fusai.
Doubles | |
---|---|
1996 Warsaw Cup by Heros | |
1995 Champions | |
Champions | |
Runners-up | |
Final score | 1–6, 6–4, 7–5 |
Fusai and Garrone lost in the final 1–6, 6–4, 7–5 against Olga Lugina and Elena Pampoulova.
Seeds
Champion seeds are indicated in bold text while text in italics indicates the round in which those seeds were eliminated.
Alexandra Fusai / Laura Garrone (Final) Olga Lugina / Elena Pampoulova (Champions) Magdalena Grzybowska / Aleksandra Olsza (Semifinals) Radka Bobková / Eva Melicharová (Semifinals)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6 | 4 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 4 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q | 4 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 6 | 2 | 6 |
gollark: Yes, since if you try and talk about nuance or tradeoffs that's interpreted as "you do not agree and therefore must be part of the outgroup". Sometimes.
gollark: There are arguments both ways. On the one hand you're trying to make sure that the people you have match the population, but on the other you're going about hiring people based on factors other than how well they can do the job (though that was... probably going to happen anyway, considering), and people may worry that they got in only because of being some race/gender.
gollark: Also, more than that, political polarization generally.
gollark: Sadly, yes, first-past-the-post is awful that way.
gollark: Yes, I agree (except possibly not with the "you need to choose a side" bit); my point is that people often *do act as if* the other side is always wrong, regardless of whether they actually *are*.
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.