1996 Peters International – Women's Singles

Gabriela Sabatini was the defending champion but did not compete that year.

Women's Singles
1996 Peters International
1995 Champion Gabriela Sabatini
Champion Monica Seles
Runner-up Lindsay Davenport
Final score4–6, 7–6, 6–3

Monica Seles won in the final 4–6, 7–6, 6–3 against Lindsay Davenport.

Seeds

A champion seed is indicated in bold text while text in italics indicates the round in which that seed was eliminated. The top four seeds received a bye to the second round.

  1. Monica Seles (Champion)
  2. Kimiko Date (Semifinals)
  3. Mary Joe Fernández (Quarterfinals)
  4. Lindsay Davenport (Final)
  5. Brenda Schultz-McCarthy (Semifinals)
  6. Chanda Rubin (Quarterfinals)
  7. Amy Frazier (Second Round)
  8. Naoko Sawamatsu (Second Round)

Draw

Key

Final
Final
1 Monica Seles 4 7 6
4 Lindsay Davenport 6 6 3

Section 1
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 M Seles 6 6  
  D Van Roost 7 6     D Van Roost 2 1  
Q V Martinek 6 3   1 M Seles 6 6  
  S Appelmans 7 6 5/r   M de Swardt 3 2  
  M de Swardt 6 7 6   M de Swardt 6 6  
  A Gavaldón 5 5   7 A Frazier 3 2  
7 A Frazier 7 7   1 M Seles 7 6  
5 B Schultz-McCarthy 6 4  
3 M J Fernández 6 6  
  A Coetzer 6 6     A Coetzer 4 2  
WC R Stubbs 2 0   3 M J Fernández 6 3  
Q M Sánchez Lorenzo 4 6 3 5 B Schultz-McCarthy 7 6  
  L Raymond 6 3 6   L Raymond 4 7 3
WC R McQuillan 7 3 4 5 B Schultz-McCarthy 6 6 6
5 B Schultz-McCarthy 6 6 6

Section 2
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
8 N Sawamatsu 6 2 7
  M Hingis 4 6 5 8 N Sawamatsu 4 2  
  N Bradtke 6 6     N Bradtke 6 6  
  K Nowak 1 1     N Bradtke 3 7 3
  H Suková 6 3 5 4 L Davenport 6 6 6
  Å Carlsson 4 6 7   Å Carlsson 2 2  
4 L Davenport 6 6  
4 L Davenport 6 4 7
6 C Rubin 6 6   2 K Date 2 6 5
  L McNeil 2 2   6 C Rubin 6 2  
Q T Ječmenica 4 7 7 Q T Ječmenica 0 1 r
  M Oremans 6 6 5 6 C Rubin 0 1  
Q A Dechaume-Balleret 4 4   2 K Date 6 6  
  I Spîrlea 6 6     I Spîrlea 4 3  
2 K Date 6 6  
gollark: What do you mean "infinite overtones"? I don't think that's how sine waves work.
gollark: In older swarms their internal networks would mess it up, but any remotely modern one uses EM.
gollark: If they're that small.
gollark: As such, you are not hearing individual ones; probably, your head disrupts any nearby antinodality™ lots anyway.
gollark: So 160 times more antinodes would make them VERY close together.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.