1996 Italian Indoor – Singles

Yevgeny Kafelnikov was the defending champion but lost in the semifinals to Marc Rosset.

Singles
1996 Italian Indoor
1995 Champion Yevgeny Kafelnikov
Champion Goran Ivanišević
Runner-up Marc Rosset
Final score6–3, 7–6 (7–3)

Goran Ivanišević won in the final 6–3, 7–6 (7–3) against Rosset.

Seeds

A champion seed is indicated in bold text while text in italics indicates the round in which that seed was eliminated.

  1. Thomas Muster (First Round)
  2. Boris Becker (First Round)
  3. Yevgeny Kafelnikov (Semifinals)
  4. Goran Ivanišević (Champion)
  5. Sergi Bruguera (First Round)
  6. Richard Krajicek (Second Round)
  7. Michael Stich (Second Round)
  8. Marc Rosset (Final)

Draw

Key
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals Final
1 T Muster 3 4  
  A Gaudenzi 6 6     A Gaudenzi 1 2  
  J Hlasek 4 6 1   R Furlan 6 6  
  R Furlan 6 3 6   R Furlan 4 6 3
  A Boetsch 77 6   8 M Rosset 6 3 6
Q D Norman 63 3     A Boetsch 6 3 0
  M Damm 2 2   8 M Rosset 3 6 6
8 M Rosset 6 6   8 M Rosset 4 6 6
3 Y Kafelnikov 77 0 6 3 Y Kafelnikov 6 2 4
  J Burillo 61 6 2 3 Y Kafelnikov 2 6 6
WC S Pescosolido 69 6 6 WC S Pescosolido 6 3 2
Q F Wibier 711 4 4 3 Y Kafelnikov 6 3 6
WC D Nargiso 3 6 1   D Vacek 3 6 3
  D Vacek 6 1 6   D Vacek 6 6  
  A Berasategui 4 0   6 R Krajicek 4 4  
6 R Krajicek 6 6   8 Marc Rosset 3 63  
5 S Bruguera 3 2   4 Goran Ivanišević 6 77  
  J Siemerink 6 6     J Siemerink 4 4  
  J Sánchez 2 7 3   A Voinea 6 6  
  A Voinea 6 5 6   A Voinea 60 1  
  F Clavet 6 77   4 G Ivanišević 77 6  
Q R Agénor 0 62     F Clavet 2 4  
  M Sinner 65 3   4 G Ivanišević 6 6  
4 G Ivanišević 77 6   4 G Ivanišević 61 6 77
7 M Stich 6 6   WC G Forget 77 3 64
  A Volkov 3 4   7 M Stich      
WC G Forget 6 6   WC G Forget w/o    
Q J Hanquez 3 4   WC G Forget 6 3 7
  D Prinosil 61 5     A Medvedev 1 6 5
  A Medvedev 77 7     A Medvedev 3 6 6
  B Ulihrach 6 6     B Ulihrach 6 4 1
2 B Becker 4 2  
gollark: IRCv3 could be good if anyone actually supported it.
gollark: Haven't looked much but it seems to also be convoluted and have way too many extensions.
gollark: My issues with it aren't that. I just don't think it's a good protocol/software design.
gollark: I know about Matrix but don't consider it very good.
gollark: I also don't think there are any very good alternatives.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.