1996 Estoril Open – Doubles
Yevgeny Kafelnikov and Andrei Olhovskiy were the defending champions but only Kafelnikov competed that year with Paul Haarhuis.
Doubles | |
---|---|
1996 Estoril Open | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 6–3, 6–2 |
Haarhuis and Kafelnikov lost in the first round to Javier Sánchez and Sjeng Schalken.
Tomás Carbonell and Francisco Roig won in the final 6–3, 6–2 against Tom Nijssen and Greg Van Emburgh.
Seeds
Paul Haarhuis / Yevgeny Kafelnikov (First Round) Ellis Ferreira / Mark Keil (Semifinals) Trevor Kronemann / David Macpherson (First Round) Libor Pimek / Byron Talbot (Quarterfinals)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 5 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 7 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | WC | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||
Q | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 4 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 7 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 5 | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 3 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 6 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 7 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 7 | 3 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | 6 |
gollark: Of course it does. I DEMAND Turing machines in my documents.
gollark: Unfortunately, it is not Turing-complete. Unless you preprocess repeatedly, in which case it is.
gollark: It could probably be interfaced to pandoc for *tons* of output formats.
gollark: Actually, this may unironically not be a bad idea, you could easily mix in code and plots and such.
gollark: Maybe what we *really* need is an elegant typesafe Haskell DSL for defining documents.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.