1996 Cerveza Club Colombia Open – Singles

Nicolás Lapentti was the defending champion but lost in the final 6–7(6–8), 6–2, 6–3 against Thomas Muster.

Singles
1996 Cerveza Club Colombia Open
1995 Champion Nicolás Lapentti
Champion Thomas Muster
Runner-up Nicolás Lapentti
Final score6–7(6–8), 6–2, 6–3


Seeds

A champion seed is indicated in bold text while text in italics indicates the round in which that seed was eliminated.

  1. Thomas Muster (Champion)
  2. Sjeng Schalken (Quarterfinals)
  3. Javier Sánchez (Second Round)
  4. Nicolás Lapentti (Final)
  5. Nicolás Pereira (Second Round)
  6. Marcelo Filippini (First Round)
  7. Mauricio Hadad (Semifinals)
  8. Fabrice Santoro (Second Round)


Draw

Key
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals Final
WC/1 T Muster 6 6  
  F Squillari 4 3   WC/1 T Muster 6 6  
  L Morejón 4 4     B Shelton 4 4  
  B Shelton 6 6   WC/1 T Muster 2 6 7
  Y Doumbia 3 4   Q R Delgado 6 1 5
Q R Delgado 6 6   Q R Delgado 77 6  
  P Campana 7 4 4 8 F Santoro 62 2  
8 F Santoro 5 6 6 WC/1 T Muster 6 67 6
3 J Sánchez 6 6     L Arnold 1 79 3
  M Rincon 4 3   3 J Sánchez 5 6 3
  M Tobon 4 62     L Arnold 7 4 6
  L Arnold 6 77     L Arnold 2 6 6
  E Ran 6 6     E Ran 6 3 3
  S Sargsian 4 4     E Ran 6 4 6
  J Golmard 4 4   5 N Pereira 2 6 2
5 N Pereira 6 6   WC/1 Thomas Muster 66 6 6
6 M Filippini 3 6 63 4 Nicolás Lapentti 78 2 3
Q F Dondo 6 1 77 Q F Dondo 5 4  
Q G Cañas 1 2     A Hernández 7 6  
  A Hernández 6 6     A Hernández 65 4  
  W Black 6 7   4 N Lapentti 77 6  
LL W McGuire 4 5     W Black 2 2  
  D Rikl 4 6 4 4 N Lapentti 6 6  
4 N Lapentti 6 4 6 4 N Lapentti 4 6 7
7 M Hadad 6 6   7 M Hadad 6 3 5
  D Nainkin 4 2   7 M Hadad 64 79 6
  D Musa 6 6     D Musa 77 67 4
WC P Moggio 2 1   7 M Hadad 6 78  
  G Etlis 7 0 6 2 S Schalken 2 66  
WC C Drada 5 6 4   G Etlis 1 6 4
Q P Albano 3 7 5 2 S Schalken 6 3 6
2 S Schalken 6 5 7
gollark: I disagree with saying "someone" for non-people entities.
gollark: There are various problems with this:- massive increase of complexity in guns- you would need to recharge it constantly, and it would need batteries and such, and would generally be a hassle- GPS spoofing (possibly just jamming, depending on design) would stop guns working- people could probably just remove the geofencing bit- how are you planning to keep the "do not shoot here" lists updated on all of them?
gollark: I sent this mere *hours* ago.
gollark: Does the particular context of it change the meaning much? Or imply that you should only do that sometimes?
gollark: Language is hard, since it often deals with things which are hard to rigorously define in the first place, is subject to bizarre evolutionary pressures, and is often manipulated for argumentative gain.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.