1996 Abierto Mexicano de Tenis – Singles

Thomas Muster was the defending champion and won in the final 7–6(7–3), 6–2 against Jiří Novák.

Singles
1996 Abierto Mexicano de Tenis
Champion Thomas Muster
Runner-up Jiří Novák
Final score7–6(7–3), 6–2

Seeds
  1. Thomas Muster (champion)
  2. Andrea Gaudenzi (quarterfinals)
  3. Jiří Novák (final)
  4. Javier Frana (quarterfinals)
  5. Francisco Clavet (semifinals)
  6. Javier Sánchez (quarterfinals)
  7. Fernando Meligeni (semifinals)
  8. Félix Mantilla (second round)

Draw

Key

Finals
Semifinals Final
          
1 Thomas Muster 6 2 6
5 Francisco Clavet 3 6 1
1 Thomas Muster 77 6
3 Jiří Novák 63 2
3 Jiří Novák 4 7 6
7 Fernando Meligeni 6 5 4

Top half
First round Second round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 T Muster 6 6  
Q J A Viloca 4 4   1 T Muster 77 6  
  E Ran 4 6 3 Q L Lobo 63 2  
Q L Lobo 6 3 6 1 T Muster 6 6  
  G Etlis 5 63   WC A Hernández 4 4  
WC A Hernández 7 77   WC A Hernández 6 7  
  J Cunha e Silva 64 4   8 F Mantilla 2 5  
8 F Mantilla 77 6   1 T Muster 6 2 6
4 J Frana 6 64 7 5 F Clavet 3 6 1
WC Ó Ortiz 2 77 5 4 J Frana 6 6  
  E Sánchez 2 2     N Marques 4 4  
  N Marques 6 6   4 J Frana 5 3  
  S Noszály 3 2   5 F Clavet 7 6  
  M Hadad 6 6     M Hadad 2 5  
  N Pereira 3 2   5 F Clavet 6 7  
5 F Clavet 6 6  

Bottom half
First round Second round Quarterfinals Semifinals
6 J Sánchez 6 6  
  J L Rascon 3 1   6 J Sánchez 6 6  
  L Morejón 64 2     F Vitoux 3 3  
  F Vitoux 77 6   6 J Sánchez 3 6 4
  N Lapentti 64 77 2 3 J Novák 6 1 6
  F Fontang 77 65 6   F Fontang 64 3  
Q F Montana 77 0 1 3 J Novák 77 6  
3 J Novák 64 6 6 3 J Novák 4 7 6
7 F Meligeni 6 77   7 F Meligeni 6 5 4
Q M Rincon 4 65   7 F Meligeni 6 6  
  B Shelton 3 77 6   B Shelton 2 4  
  M Petchey 6 65 2 7 F Meligeni 77 2 7
  S Campbell 3 2   2 A Gaudenzi 63 6 5
WC L Lavalle 6 6   WC L Lavalle 3 66  
  K Goossens 3 6 3 2 A Gaudenzi 6 78  
2 A Gaudenzi 6 4 6
gollark: It's wrong and abuse-of-notationy however.
gollark: And this isn't even *used anywhere* except that one or two of the integration questions use this as an extra layer of indirection.
gollark: The sum there makes no sense, and I'm pretty sure this is actually wrong for some integrals.
gollark: This is the untruncated version.
gollark: See, this is bad.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.