1996–97 Ukrainian Football Amateur League

1996–97 Amateur championship of Ukraine was the fifth amateur championship of Ukraine and the 33rd since the establishment of championship among fitness clubs (KFK) in 1964. The format of competitions was preserved as in the Soviet competitions where winner of six regional groups advanced to the final (second) stage.

Ukrainian Football Amateur League
Season1996–97
ChampionsElektron Romny (1st title)
Tsementnyk-Khorda Mykolaiv (losing finalist)

First stage competitions were played in double round robin format where each team played with others four times. There were total of 33 teams competing. Final stage was introduced this season for group winners to identify the champion of the league.

Teams

Location map
Izotop
Kovel
Dynamo
Berd
Budivelnyk
Budivelnyk
Slovianets
Kharchovyk
Pivdenstal
Shakhtar
Shakhtar
Enerhetyk
Metalurh
Blyskavka
Lokomotyv
Lokomotyv
Sotel
Kryvbas-Ruda
Chornomorets
Obriy
Mykolaiv-2
Tavria-Metalurh
Locations of team home grounds in the 1994-95 Ukrainian Championship among amateur teams

First stage

Group 1
Pos Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts Qualification
1 Naftovyk Dolyna (Q) 12 7 4 1 16 4 +12 25 Finals
2 Promin Sambir 12 5 3 4 11 12 −1 18
3 Zoria Khorostkiv 12 4 1 7 8 6 +2 13 withdrew
4 Medyk Morshyn 12 2 2 8 5 18 −13 8
5 Berkut Bedevlia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 withdrew
Source:
(Q) Qualified to the phase indicated.

Group 2
Pos Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts Qualification
1 Tsementnyk-Khorda Mykolaiv (Q) 12 11 0 1 15 5 +10 33 Finals
2 Izotop Kuznetsovsk 12 6 0 6 7 11 −4 18
3 Dynamo Manevychi 12 5 0 7 3 5 −2 15
4 Berd Berdychiv 12 2 0 10 2 6 −4 6 withdrew
5 Budivelnyk Zhytomyr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Source:
(Q) Qualified to the phase indicated.

Notes:

  • Dynamo Manevychi replaced FC Kovel during the mid-season.

Group 3
Pos Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts Qualification
1 Elektron Romny (Q) 16 14 0 2 26 5 +21 42 Finals
2 Slovianets Konotop 16 7 5 4 18 12 +6 26 Promoted
3 Dynamo-3 Kyiv 16 6 4 6 22 18 +4 22
4 Kharchovyk Popivka 16 5 2 9 17 28 −11 17
5 Nyva Myronivka 16 1 3 12 7 27 −20 6
6 Budivelnyk Brovary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 withdrew
Source:
(Q) Qualified to the phase indicated.

Group 4
Pos Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts Qualification
1 Pivdenstal Yenakiyeve (Q) 16 10 2 4 24 8 +16 32 Finals
2 Shakhtar Krasnyi Luch 16 8 0 8 14 17 −3 24
3 Shakhtar Torez 16 6 3 7 21 21 0 21
4 Enerhetyk Komsomolske 16 6 2 8 15 24 −9 20
5 Krystal Parkhomivka 16 5 3 8 17 21 −4 18
Source:
(Q) Qualified to the phase indicated.

Group 5
Pos Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts Qualification
1 Metalurh Komsomolske (Q) 20 13 4 3 21 15 +6 43 Finals
2 Avers Bakhmach 20 13 4 3 21 15 +6 43 Promoted
3 Lokomotyv Znamianka 20 10 4 6 22 16 +6 34
4 Silur-Dynamo Khartsyzk 20 6 6 8 16 21 −5 24
5 Lokomotyv Dnipropetrovsk 20 6 4 10 18 26 −8 22
6 Sotel Kirovohrad 20 0 2 18 7 15 −8 2 withdrew
7 Blyskavka Berdiansk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Source:
(Q) Qualified to the phase indicated.

Notes:

Metalurh – Avers 3:2

Group 6
Pos Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts Qualification
1 Chornomorets Sevastopol (Q) 8 7 1 0 5 2 +3 22 Finals
2 Obriy Nikopol 8 2 1 5 5 3 +2 7 withdrew
3 Mykolaiv-2 8 0 0 8 0 5 −5 0
4 Tavria-Metalurh Prymorsk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Kryvbas-Ruda Kryvyi Rih 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Source:
(Q) Qualified to the phase indicated.

Finals

The second stage was finals that took place in Romny, Sumy Oblast on June 11–15, 1997.

Group A
Pos Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts
1 Elektron Romny 2 2 0 0 5 1 +4 6
2 Naftovyk Dolyna 2 1 0 1 2 3 −1 3
3 Metalurh Komsomolske 2 0 0 2 0 3 −3 0
Source:

Group B
Pos Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts
1 Tsementnyk-Khorda Mykolaiv 2 2 0 0 4 2 +2 6
2 Chornomorets Sevastopol 2 1 0 1 3 3 0 3
3 Pivdenstal Yenakiyeve 2 0 0 2 0 2 −2 0
Source:

Cup participants

Krystal Parkhomivka, Silur-Dynamo Khartsyzk, Dynamo Manevychi, Slovianets Konotop

gollark: Is it going to just send a description of what to draw? In that case, lots of overhead and problems porting to different environments since for example each GUI framework will end up needing its own module communication layer.
gollark: For one thing, is a module just going to be allowed somehow to draw on the region of the screen it's meant to be set up for?
gollark: Yes it is.
gollark: These "modules", they could communicate over some sort of unified IPC framework with some standard format or whatever, but probably each language/framework would end up having to implement its own method of rendering what gets sent over.
gollark: They can just send JSON-serialized messages or whatever, it's just slower than using one binary.

See also


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.