1995–96 Esiliiga
The 1995–96 Esiliiga is the fifth season of the Esiliiga, second-highest Estonian league for association football clubs, since its establishment in 1992.
| Season | 1995–96 |
|---|---|
| Champions | FC Norma Tallinn |
| Promoted | JK Vall Tallinn |
| Relegated | FC Arsenal Tallinn DAG Tartu |
← 1994–95 1996–97 → | |
Main tournament
Four best teams qualify to the Premier Division promotion play-off, other four to First Division promotion play-off.
Table
| Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FC Norma Tallinn | 14 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 59 | 5 | +54 | 39 |
| 2 | JK Vall Tallinn | 14 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 36 | 20 | +16 | 28 |
| 3 | Tallinna Jalgpallikool | 14 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 19 | 30 | −11 | 22 |
| 4 | JK Dünamo Tallinn | 14 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 35 | 30 | +5 | 22 |
| 5 | FC Lelle | 14 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 32 | 30 | +2 | 20 |
| 6 | JK Tulevik Viljandi | 14 | 6 | 0 | 8 | 28 | 34 | −6 | 18 |
| 7 | FC Arsenal Tallinn | 14 | 5 | 0 | 9 | 26 | 31 | −5 | 15 |
| 8 | DAG Tartu | 14 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 12 | 67 | −55 | 1 |
Source: rsssf.com
Premier Division promotion play-off
JK Vall Tallinn promoted to Premier Division, Pärnu JK relegated to First Division.
Table
| Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eesti Põlevkivi Jõhvi | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 23 | 7 | +16 | 21 |
| 2 | JK Vall Tallinn (P) | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 9 | +9 | 21 |
| 3 | FC Norma Tallinn | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 11 | +2 | 17 |
| 4 | Pärnu JK (R) | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 12 | 20 | −8 | 14 |
| 5 | JK Dünamo Tallinn | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 14 | −6 | 8 |
| 6 | Tallinna Jalgpallikool | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22 | −13 | 5 |
First Division promotion play-off
JK Kalev Sillamäe and Olümp Maardu promoted to First Division, FC Arsenal Tallinn and DAG Tartu relegated to Second Division.
Table
| Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FC Lelle | 12 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 34 | 20 | +14 | 27 |
| 2 | JK Kalev Sillamäe (P) | 12 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 30 | 10 | +20 | 25 |
| 3 | Olümp Maardu (P) | 12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 29 | 20 | +9 | 20 |
| 4 | JK Tulevik Viljandi | 12 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 30 | 17 | +13 | 19 |
| 5 | FC Arsenal Tallinn (R) | 12 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 31 | 20 | +11 | 19 |
| 6 | DAG Tartu (R) | 12 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 20 | 42 | −22 | 9 |
| 7 | Lokomotiiv Valga | 12 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 11 | 59 | −48 | 1 |
| – | United Pärnu[lower-alpha 1] | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- United Pärnu were withdrew from the play-off.
gollark: I tried using it for stuff and I disliked it.
gollark: Haskell is obviously no, Python is quite slow and has different ecosystem problems as well as a remarkable amount of weird inconsistency, JS dependencies break after about 5 months and it's an awful language, Rust is somewhat nice but annoying compared to higher level languages, Clojure is maybe good however Lisp and also Java (well, JVM), and... that's about it?
gollark: OCaml suffers from the same sort of ecosystem problem.
gollark: Thus, I am condemned to eternal suffering and minoteaur will never be finished.
gollark: I'm actually investigating F# as a non-bad language, and while it is in fact an excellent language according to the osmarks.tk™ arbitrary language ratings™, the tooling is æææææÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆæææææÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆææÆÆÆÆæææææÆÆÆÆÆæææ (very heavyweight and annoying) and much of the ecosystem is too "enterprisey".
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.