1994 Virginia Slims of Houston – Singles

Conchita Martínez was the defending champion but lost in the semifinals to Sabine Hack.

Singles
1994 Virginia Slims of Houston
1993 Champion Conchita Martínez
Champion Sabine Hack
Runner-up Mary Pierce
Final score7–5, 6–4

Hack won in the final 7–5, 6–4 against Mary Pierce.

Seeds

A champion seed is indicated in bold text while text in italics indicates the round in which that seed was eliminated. The top four seeds received a bye to the second round.

  1. Conchita Martínez (Semifinals)
  2. Martina Navratilova (Second Round)
  3. Magdalena Maleeva (Second Round)
  4. Mary Pierce (Final)
  5. Lindsay Davenport (Second Round)
  6. Zina Garrison-Jackson (First Round)
  7. Sabine Hack (Champion)
  8. Barbara Rittner (First Round)

Draw

Key

Final
Final
7 Sabine Hack 7 6  
4 Mary Pierce 5 4  

Section 1
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 C Martínez 6 6  
  P Tarabini 1 4     H Kelesi 3 2  
  H Kelesi 6 6   1 C Martínez 6 6  
LL A Keller 0 1   Q Á Montolio 3 1  
Q Á Montolio 6 6   Q Á Montolio 6 6  
  I Majoli 2 1   5 L Davenport 3 4  
5 L Davenport 6 6   1 C Martínez 6 4 4
7 S Hack 2 6 6
3 M Maleeva 6 6 6
Q V Martinek 6 6   Q V Martinek 4 7 7
  D Monami 2 3   Q V Martinek 2 1  
  S Cecchini 3 6 6 7 S Hack 6 6  
WC F Zuluaga 6 4 3   S Cecchini 1 0  
  A Grossman 4 6 3 7 S Hack 6 6  
7 S Hack 6 4 6

Section 2
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
6 Z Garrison-Jackson 2 4  
  M Babel 6 6     M Babel 5 6 2
Q V Ruano-Pascual 5 0     S Cacic 7 4 6
  S Cacic 7 6     S Cacic 0 1  
  I Spîrlea 3 3   4 M Pierce 6 6  
  N Muns-Jagerman 6 6     N Muns-Jagerman 1 4  
4 M Pierce 6 6  
4 M Pierce 6 6  
8 B Rittner 2 4   WC Å Carlsson 2 2  
WC Å Carlsson 6 6   WC Å Carlsson 6 6  
  W Probst 6 6     W Probst 4 3  
  C Kuhlman 3 4   WC Å Carlsson 6 6  
  L Golarsa 6 3 4 Q B Fulco-Villella 2 4  
Q B Fulco-Villella 3 6 6 Q B Fulco-Villella 1 6 6
2 M Navratilova 6 4 3
gollark: It might actually be worth implementing a better signing/trust system than "everything is signed with the master key".
gollark: I could probably make the PX signing program stick `return` on the end, but then I would have to revoke existing programs and I didn't add a mechanism for that.
gollark: You know, most of the sandbox exploits have just focused on finding the many logic errors/weird environment issues, not exploiting crypto. This is an interesting change, at least.
gollark: Or sticking `return` at the end?
gollark: Should I be limiting signature length or something?
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.