1994 OTB International Open – Singles

Thomas Enqvist was the defending champion, but lost in the quarterfinals this year.

Singles
1994 OTB International Open
Champion Jacco Eltingh
Runner-up Chuck Adams
Final score6–3, 6–4

Jacco Eltingh won the tournament, beating Chuck Adams in the final, 6–3, 6–4.

Seeds

  1. Sergi Bruguera (Second Round)
  2. Carlos Costa (Second Round)
  3. Paul Haarhuis (First Round)
  4. Ivan Lendl (Second Round)
  5. Javier Sánchez (Second Round)
  6. Thomas Enqvist (Quarterfinals)
  7. Andrei Chesnokov (Second Round)
  8. Richard Fromberg (First Round)

Draw

Key

Finals

Semifinals Final
          
  Jonas Björkman 3 4  
  Chuck Adams 6 6  
  Chuck Adams 3 4  
  Jacco Eltingh 6 6  
  Jörn Renzenbrink 65 3  
  Jacco Eltingh 77 6  

Top Half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 S Bruguera 6 6  
  A Cherkasov 2 0   1 S Bruguera 6 4 2
  J Björkman 6 6     J Björkman 2 6 6
  J Siemerink 3 3     J Björkman 6 6  
  Y El Aynaoui 6 6     Y El Aynaoui 0 1  
WC J Tarango 4 4     Y El Aynaoui 77 1 6
WC M Wilander 6 4 6 WC M Wilander 64 6 2
8 R Fromberg 1 6 3   J Björkman 3 4  
4 I Lendl 0 6 6   C Adams 6 6  
Q R Gilbert 6 2 3 4 I Lendl 65 4  
  C Adams 6 6     C Adams 77 6  
  B Karbacher 3 2     C Adams 77 6  
  S Bryan 6 6   6 T Enqvist 62 3  
  J Bates 3 1     S Bryan 0 3  
Q L Lavalle 5 65   6 T Enqvist 6 6  
6 T Enqvist 7 77  

Bottom Half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
5 J Sánchez 66 6 6
  À Corretja 78 3 2 5 J Sánchez 5 65  
  J Renzenbrink 6 6     J Renzenbrink 7 77  
Q T Högstedt 1 4     J Renzenbrink 6 6  
  M-C Goellner 6 6     M-C Goellner 2 4  
  B Steven 3 4     M-C Goellner 77 77  
  A Antonitsch 6 6     A Antonitsch 64 65  
3 P Haarhuis 3 1     J Renzenbrink 65 3  
7 A Chesnokov 6 77     J Eltingh 77 6  
WC J Arias 4 63   7 A Chesnokov 3 77 1
  J-P Fleurian 65 64     J Eltingh 6 63 6
  J Eltingh 77 77     J Eltingh 77 77  
  N Kulti 7 2 3   J Apell 63 64  
  J Apell 5 6 6   J Apell 6 6  
Q G Grant 3 3   2 C Costa 1 4  
2 C Costa 6 6  
gollark: Yes. It's still a bad fire extinguisher regardless of how good the designers thought/claimed they were being.
gollark: Systems have no intentions. People in them might, and the designers probably did, and the designers also likely claimed some intention, and people also probably ascribe some to them. But that doesn't mean that the system itself "wants" to do any of those.
gollark: I think you could reasonably argue that it's better to respect institutions than ignore them because it's better for social cohesion/stability, but I don't agree that you should respect them because they're meant to be fair and because you can always get them to fix problems you experience if this isn't actually true.
gollark: If the fire extinguisher actually explodes when used to put out fires, it would be a bad fire extinguisher even if the designers talk about how good it is and how many fires it can remove.
gollark: We should be evaluating it on how well it does what we want it to, not how well the designers *claim it does*.

References

    This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.