1991–92 Meistriliiga (ice hockey) season
The 1991-92 Meistriliiga season was the second season of the Meistriliiga, the top level of ice hockey in Estonia. Nine teams participated in the league, and Kreenholm Narva won the championship.
First round
| Club | GP | W | T | L | GF-GA | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Keemik Kohtla-Järve | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 93:13 | 16 |
| 2. | Kreenholm Narva | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 67:29 | 14 |
| 3. | Tallinna JSK | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 69:38 | 12 |
| 4. | TVMK Tallinn | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 64:34 | 10 |
| 5. | Linnameeskond Tartu | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 39:45 | 8 |
| 6. | Talleks Tallinn | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 71:56 | 6 |
| 7. | ATP Kohtla-Järve | 8 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 29:99 | 2 |
| 8. | HK Jõgeva | 8 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 20:78 | 2 |
| 9. | Kalev Sillamäe | 8 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 9:69 | 2 |
Final round
| Club | GP | W | T | L | GF-GA | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Kreenholm Narva | 28 | 23 | 1 | 4 | 231:92 | 47 |
| 2. | Tallinna JSK | 28 | 19 | 0 | 9 | 200:143 | 38 |
| 3. | TVMK Tallinn | 28 | 16 | 2 | 10 | 194:159 | 34 |
| 4. | Keemik Kohtla-Järve | 28 | 15 | 3 | 10 | 213:121 | 33 |
| 5. | Talleks Tallinn | 28 | 12 | 0 | 16 | 178:184 | 24 |
| 6. | Linnameeskond Tartu | 28 | 5 | 0 | 23 | 72:194 | 10 |
gollark: Regardless of what choice you make, the contents of the boxes are fixed, thus pick mildly more money. This probably sounds unsmart to you, which is either because you (and the server generally) are/is right, or because you fell into one side and now think it's obvious.
gollark: As I said, in general apparently both sides are split pretty evenly, have fairly convincing arguments each way, and both think that their answer is obvious and the other is wrong.
gollark: Perhaps we are HIGHLY smart unlike random internet people and OBVIOUSLY picked the correct® answer, or perhaps we just hold similar philosophical/intellectual/whatever views which make us more inclined to one-box.
gollark: I mean, maybe the average internet rabble is just bad at understanding what "perfect prediction" means, but you could probably argue that it's "rational" at the time of choosing to take both, even if it's... acausally...? worse for you. Nobody here appears to have.
gollark: It's paradoxical because it breaks decision theories somewhat.
External links
- Season on hockeyarchives.info
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.