1990 ICC Trophy squads

Seventeen teams participated in the 1990 ICC Trophy, the fourth edition of the tournament. No teams were making their debut, but Singapore returned to competition for the first time since the 1982 edition.

Argentina

Only players who appeared in at least one match at the tournament are listed. The leading run-scorer is marked with a dagger (†) and the leading wicket-taker with a double dagger (‡).


Source: ESPNcricinfo

Bangladesh

Only players who appeared in at least one match at the tournament are listed. The leading run-scorer is marked with a dagger (†) and the leading wicket-taker with a double dagger (‡).


Source: ESPNcricinfo

Bermuda

Only players who appeared in at least one match at the tournament are listed. The leading run-scorer is marked with a dagger (†) and the leading wicket-taker with a double dagger (‡).


Source: ESPNcricinfo

Canada

Only players who appeared in at least one match at the tournament are listed. The leading run-scorer is marked with a dagger (†) and the leading wicket-taker with a double dagger (‡).


Source: ESPNcricinfo

Denmark

Only players who appeared in at least one match at the tournament are listed. The leading run-scorer is marked with a dagger (†) and the leading wicket-taker with a double dagger (‡).


Source: ESPNcricinfo

East and Central Africa

Only players who appeared in at least one match at the tournament are listed. The leading run-scorer is marked with a dagger (†) and the leading wicket-taker with a double dagger (‡).


Source: ESPNcricinfo

Fiji

Only players who appeared in at least one match at the tournament are listed. The leading run-scorer is marked with a dagger (†) and the leading wicket-taker with a double dagger (‡).


Source: ESPNcricinfo

Gibraltar

Only players who appeared in at least one match at the tournament are listed. The leading run-scorer is marked with a dagger (†) and the leading wicket-taker with a double dagger (‡).


Source: ESPNcricinfo

Hong Kong

Only players who appeared in at least one match at the tournament are listed. The leading run-scorer is marked with a dagger (†) and the leading wicket-taker with a double dagger (‡).


Source: ESPNcricinfo

Israel

Only players who appeared in at least one match at the tournament are listed. The leading run-scorer is marked with a dagger (†) and the leading wicket-taker with a double dagger (‡).


Source: ESPNcricinfo

Kenya

Only players who appeared in at least one match at the tournament are listed. The leading run-scorer is marked with a dagger (†) and the leading wicket-taker with a double dagger (‡).


Source: ESPNcricinfo

Malaysia

Only players who appeared in at least one match at the tournament are listed. The leading run-scorer is marked with a dagger (†) and the leading wicket-taker with a double dagger (‡).


Source: ESPNcricinfo

Netherlands

Only players who appeared in at least one match at the tournament are listed. The leading run-scorer is marked with a dagger (†) and the leading wicket-taker with a double dagger (‡).


Source: ESPNcricinfo

Papua New Guinea

Only players who appeared in at least one match at the tournament are listed. The leading run-scorer is marked with a dagger (†) and the leading wicket-taker with a double dagger (‡).


Source: ESPNcricinfo

Singapore

Only players who appeared in at least one match at the tournament are listed. The leading run-scorer is marked with a dagger (†) and the leading wicket-taker with a double dagger (‡).


Source: ESPNcricinfo

United States

Only players who appeared in at least one match at the tournament are listed. The leading run-scorer is marked with a dagger (†) and the leading wicket-taker with a double dagger (‡).


Source: ESPNcricinfo

Zimbabwe

Only players who appeared in at least one match at the tournament are listed. The leading run-scorer is marked with a dagger (†) and the leading wicket-taker with a double dagger (‡).


Source: ESPNcricinfo

Sources

gollark: By which I mean both manufacturers and users.
gollark: Security is an issue too, because nobody really cares to update them.
gollark: Smart TVs tend to be buggy and unreliable, and you can't swap out the "smart" bit when something inevitably breaks or stops working or stops receiving updates or has some component stripped out because [random stupid licensing issue], and the reason they're cheap and prevalent is *monetization via data mining*.
gollark: Plus decently fast WiFi and stuff, they're great streaming boxes.
gollark: RPi4s can do 4K60p, not that I think 4K is much use.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.