1989 South Australian Open – Doubles

Darren Cahill and Mark Kratzmann were the defending champions but they competed with different partners that year, Cahill with Mark Woodforde and Kratzmann with Glenn Layendecker.

Doubles
1989 South Australian Open
Champions Neil Broad
Stefan Kruger
Runners-up Mark Kratzmann
Glenn Layendecker
Final score6–2, 7–6

Cahill and Woodforde lost in the semifinals to Neil Broad and Stefan Kruger.

Kratzmann and Layendecker lost in the final 6–2, 7–6 against Broad and Kruger.

Seeds
  1. Darren Cahill / Mark Woodforde (Semifinals)
  2. Brad Drewett / Wally Masur (First Round)
  3. Broderick Dyke / Tom Nijssen (Semifinals)
  4. Patrik Kühnen / Udo Riglewski (First Round)

Draw

Key
First Round Quarterfinals Semifinals Final
1 D Cahill
M Woodforde 		4 6 6
  J Stoltenberg
T Woodbridge 		6 3 4 1 D Cahill
M Woodforde 		6 1 6
  O Delaître
T Theine 		4 5     R Barlow
M Koevermans 		1 6 1
  R Barlow
M Koevermans 		6 7   1 D Cahill
M Woodforde 		4 3  
4 P Kühnen
U Riglewski 		3 3     N Broad
S Kruger 		6 6  
  N Broad
S Kruger 		6 6     N Broad
S Kruger 		6 6  
  D Macpherson
S Youl 		6 6     D Macpherson
S Youl 		4 3  
  J Apell
M Tideman 		3 2     N Broad
S Kruger 		6 7  
  A Mronz
C Suk 		3 4     M Kratzmann
G Layendecker 		2 6  
  S Barr
R Rasheed 		6 6     S Barr
R Rasheed 		3 6  
  I Flego
G Ivanišević 		4 4   3 B Dyke
T Nijssen 		6 7  
3 B Dyke
T Nijssen 		6 6   3 B Dyke
T Nijssen 		4 4  
  J Anderson
J Morgan 		3 6     M Kratzmann
G Layendecker 		6 6  
  A Olhovskiy
A Volkov 		6 7     A Olhovskiy
A Volkov 		7 3 2
  M Kratzmann
G Layendecker 		4 7 6   M Kratzmann
G Layendecker 		6 6 6
2 B Drewett
W Masur 		6 6 1
gollark: My visualization's only 2D for now, but I have progressive axis data so it *could* be made 3D if I could be bothered to do that (3D is haaaard).
gollark: https://lucasnorth.uk/sapply/ is one which has *three* axes, and is therefore better.
gollark: That's the uncool test.
gollark: The link to the political compass test thing or my visualization?
gollark: I do need actual numbers, although I suppose I could just put it down as, what, -5 5?
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.