1985 Edgbaston Cup – Singles

Pam Shriver was the defending champion and won in the final 6–1, 6–0 against Betsy Nagelsen.

Singles
1985 Edgbaston Cup
1984 Champion Pam Shriver
Champion Pam Shriver
Runner-up Betsy Nagelsen
Final score6–1, 6–0
Main article: 1985 Edgbaston Cup

Seeds

The top eight seeds receive a bye into the second round.

  1. Pam Shriver (Champion)
  2. Pam Casale (Second Round)
  3. Alycia Moulton (Quarterfinals)
  4. Virginia Ruzici (Second Round, retired)
  5. Elise Burgin (Semifinals)
  6. Dianne Balestrat (Third Round)
  7. Rosalyn Fairbank (Third Round)
  8. Annabel Croft (Second Round)
  9. Camille Benjamin (Third Round)
  10. Anne Minter (Third Round)
  11. Sharon Walsh-Pete (First Round)
  12. Robin White (Quarterfinals)
  13. Jo Durie (Second Round)
  14. Elizabeth Smylie (First Round)

Qualifying

Draw

Key

Finals
Quarterfinals Semifinals Final
               
1 Pam Shriver 6 6  
  Anne Hobbs 4 0  
1 Pam Shriver 6 6  
5 Elise Burgin 4 2  
12 Robin White 7 4 4
5 Elise Burgin 6 6 6
1 Pam Shriver 6 6  
  Betsy Nagelsen 1 0  
  Susan Mascarin 7 6  
3 Alycia Moulton 6 4  
  Susan Mascarin 6 5 4
  Betsy Nagelsen 3 7 6
  Ann Henricksson 3 3  
  Betsy Nagelsen 6 6  

Top Half

Section 1
First Round Second Round Third Round Quarterfinals
1 P Shriver 6 6  
  N Dias 5 2     C Jolissaint 3 4  
  C Jolissaint 7 6   1 P Shriver 6 6  
  M Mesker 6 7     M Mesker 1 3  
  E Inoue 3 5     M Mesker 6 7  
  Y Vermaak 6 2 1 13 J Durie 4 6  
13 J Durie 1 6 6 1 P Shriver 6 6  
  A Brown 6 6     A Hobbs 4 0  
  B Herr 3 3     A Brown 2 0  
  E Eliseenko 2 1     A Hobbs 6 6  
  A Hobbs 6 6     A Hobbs 6 7  
  W White 7 6   7 R Fairbank 3 5  
Q H Ludloff 5 1     W White 6 3 1
7 R Fairbank 1 6 6

Section 2
First Round Second Round Third Round Quarterfinals
4 V Ruzici 1 ret.  
  C Vanier 6 1     L Drescher 3    
  L Drescher 7 6     L Drescher 4 0  
  B Gerken 6 6   12 R White 6 6  
  L McNeil 3 1     B Gerken 4 4  
  L Savchenko 6 1 4 12 R White 6 6  
12 R White 4 6 6 12 R White 7 4 4
9 C Benjamin 6 7   5 E Burgin 6 6 6
Q S Cherneva 3 6   9 C Benjamin 6 6  
  R Uys 3 6 6   R Uys 4 4  
  M Brown 6 2 4 9 C Benjamin 3 7 4
  S Gomer 4 6 3 5 E Burgin 6 6 6
  E Minter 6 3 6   E Minter 3 5  
5 E Burgin 6 7  

Bottom Half

Section 3
First Round Second Round Third Round Quarterfinals
8 A Croft 3 5  
  H Kelesi 1 5     S Mascarin 6 7  
  S Mascarin 6 7     S Mascarin 6 6  
Q J Mundel 2 2   10 A Minter 2 4  
  K Skronská 6 6     K Skronská 6 4 1
  G Kim 2 7 6 10 A Minter 4 6 6
10 A Minter 6 5 8   S Mascarin 7 6  
Q M-C Calleja 6 3   3 A Moulton 6 4  
Q T Mochizuki 7 6   Q T Mochizuki 5 1  
Q K Kinney 6 6   Q K Kinney 7 6  
  M Paz 3 4   Q K Kinney 2 3  
  S Collins 4 3   3 A Moulton 6 6  
  M-L Piatek 6 6     M-L Piatek 2 1  
3 A Moulton 6 6  

Section 4
First Round Second Round Third Round Quarterfinals
6 D Balestrat 7 6  
  G Rush 3 4     A White 5 3  
  A White 6 6   6 D Balestrat 6 4  
Q K Sands 6 7 2   A Henricksson 7 6  
  A Henricksson 7 6 6   A Henricksson 6 6  
  T Holladay 6 6     T Holladay 4 2  
14 E Smylie 1 3     A Henricksson 3 3  
11 S Walsh-Pete 6 0 5   B Nagelsen 6 6  
  B Mould 3 6 7   B Mould 2 3  
  S Amiach 4 6 0   K Shaefer 6 6  
  K Shaefer 6 3 6   K Shaefer 5 3  
Q M Yanagi 7 0 4   B Nagelsen 7 6  
  B Nagelsen 5 6 6   B Nagelsen 6 6  
2 P Casale 2 2  
gollark: As I said, in general apparently both sides are split pretty evenly, have fairly convincing arguments each way, and both think that their answer is obvious and the other is wrong.
gollark: Perhaps we are HIGHLY smart unlike random internet people and OBVIOUSLY picked the correct® answer, or perhaps we just hold similar philosophical/intellectual/whatever views which make us more inclined to one-box.
gollark: I mean, maybe the average internet rabble is just bad at understanding what "perfect prediction" means, but you could probably argue that it's "rational" at the time of choosing to take both, even if it's... acausally...? worse for you. Nobody here appears to have.
gollark: It's paradoxical because it breaks decision theories somewhat.
gollark: That's kind of the point of the paradox?

References
    This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.