1984 Australian Open – Women's Singles Qualifying

This article displays the qualifying draw for women's singles at the 1984 Australian Open.

Women's Singles Qualifying
1984 Australian Open
Main articles: 1984 Australian Open and 1984 Australian Open – Women's Singles

Seeds
  1. Masako Yanagi (First round)
  2. Lori McNeil (First round)
  3. Catherine Suire (First round)
  4. Amanda Brown (Qualifying Competition)
  5. -
  6. Natasha Reva (First round)
  7. Lea Antonoplis (Qualified)
  8. Kim Steinmetz (Qualifying Competition)

Qualifiers
  1. Barbara Gerken
  2. Sophie Amiach
  3. Corinne Vanier
  4. Svetlana Parkhomenko
  5. Lea Antonoplis
  6. Larisa Neiland
  7. Colleen Carney
  8. Sara Gomer

Qualifying draw

Key

First qualifier
First Round Qualifying Competition
          
1 Masako Yanagi 68 2
  Barbara Gerken 710 6
  Barbara Gerken 6 4 6
  Michelle Turk 4 6 1
  Michelle Turk 6 6
  Elena Eliseenko 3 2

Second qualifier
First Round Qualifying Competition
          
  Maeve Quinlan 0 3
  Nathalie Herreman 6 6
  Nathalie Herreman 6 0 3
Alt Sophie Amiach 3 6 6
  Rina Einy 5 4
Alt Sophie Amiach 7 6

Third qualifier
First Round Qualifying Competition
          
4 Amanda Brown 6 6
  Emiko Okagawa 1 2
4 Amanda Brown 63 7 3
  Corinne Vanier 77 5 6
  Corinne Vanier 6 6
  Susanne Schmid 2 3

Fourth qualifier
First Round Qualifying Competition
          
  Svetlana Parkhomenko 6 6
  Miranda Yates 1 4
  Svetlana Parkhomenko 6 6
8 Kim Steinmetz 4 4
  Sue Barker 64 2
8 Kim Steinmetz 77 6

Fifth qualifier
First Round Qualifying Competition
          
7 Lea Antonoplis 6 1 7
  Catrin Jexell 1 6 5
7 Lea Antonoplis 6 6
  Amanda Tobin 4 3
  Amanda Tobin 77 3 6
  Jennifer Reinbold 63 6 3

Sixth qualifier
First Round Qualifying Competition
          
  Candy Reynolds 7 2 6
  Julie Salmon 5 6 2
  Candy Reynolds 1 3
  Larisa Neiland 6 6
  Larisa Neiland 77 63 6
3 Catherine Suire 60 77 4

Seventh qualifier
First Round Qualifying Competition
          
6 Natasha Reva 2 4
  Colleen Carney 6 6
  Colleen Carney 7 6
  Molly Van Nostrand 5 3
  Carin Anderholm 3 5
  Molly Van Nostrand 6 7

Eighth qualifier
First Round Qualifying Competition
          
  Linda Howell 6 7
  Robin White 4 5
  Linda Howell 4 3
  Sara Gomer 6 6
  Sara Gomer 6 6
2 Lori McNeil 4 3
gollark: <@509849474647064576>
gollark: ```Y'allEver hear of a cool language?It goes a little likefibs = 0 : 1 : zipWith (+) fibs (tail fibs)Oh, you didn't understand that?ExactlyHaskell is the worstWorse than this verseIf you use Haskell, reverseI just rhymed reverse with verseHaskell is still worse than this verseThose who use Haskell, let me enlighten youHaskell is the only language that can't shine a light on youWhy? Because that's IO (oh)Haskell has a successor functionWhat a coincidence, because it sucksLet me introduce you to my friend FoopyFoopy's my own language, it's everything Haskell couldn't doHey, Foopy, my main man?Foopy: Yeah, dude?You suck too!Foopy is impossible to useFunctional programming's like boozeWith objects you can't loseHaskell's the worst, Foopy's the worst, OOP is the wayFP's the worstWorse than this verseIf you use FP, reverseI just rhymed reverse with verseFP is still worse than this verseLemme introduce some morePython, Rust, Ruby, these aren't choresRust's the ultimate high-level languageIt's taking the world by stormPython and Ruby are your Swiss army knivesAlways there when you need them mostThese languages are beautiful in their simplicityBeautiful in their complexityHaskell only has complexityUgly complexityHard to use, hard to learnHaskell is the worstWorse than this verseIf you use Haskell, reverseI just rhymed reverse with verseHaskell is still worse than this verse```From the Esolangs server.
gollark: I mean, it's probably right, but not much use.
gollark: Kind of?
gollark: Er... maybe?
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.