1970 U.S. Professional Indoor – Doubles

Doubles
	1970 U.S. Professional Indoor
Champions	Ilie Năstase; Ion Ţiriac
Runners-up	Arthur Ashe; Dennis Ralston
Final score	6–4, 6–3

Tom Okker and Marty Riessen were the defending champions, but lost in the second round this year.

Ilie Năstase and Ion Ţiriac successfully defended their title, defeating Arthur Ashe and Dennis Ralston 6–4, 6–3 in the final.

Seeds

John Newcombe / Tony Roche (Second Round)
Tom Okker / Marty Riessen (Second Round)
Robert Lutz / Stan Smith (Second Round)
Ken Rosewall / Fred Stolle (First Round)

Draw

Key

Finals

Semifinals					Final


	Jim McManus Jim Osborne	1	3

	Ilie Năstase Ion Țiriac	6	6
						Ilie Năstase Ion Țiriac	6	6

						Arthur Ashe Dennis Ralston	4	3
	Arthur Ashe Dennis Ralston	7	4	6

	Andrés Gimeno Manuel Santana	5	6	3

Top Half

First Round					Second Round					Quarterfinals					Semifinals


					2	T Okker M Riessen	4	6	4
						J McManus J Osborne	6	2	5
											J McManus J Osborne	6	5	6
											EB Buchholz R Moore	2	7	1
						EB Buchholz R Moore	4	6	5
						G Battrick B Carmichael	6	4	3
																J McManus J Osborne	1	3
	I Năstase I Țiriac	6	6													I Năstase I Țiriac	6	6
	J Borowiak H Rahim	4	4			I Năstase I Țiriac	6	4	5
	C Richey R Taylor	6	2	6		C Richey R Taylor	3	6	4
	M Cox G Stilwell	2	6	4							I Năstase I Țiriac	6	4	6
	R Barth T Gorman	6	6								T Koch P Lall	3	6	4
	Donald Lutz B Martin	1	1			R Barth T Gorman	5	7	2
	T Koch P Lall	7	5	5		T Koch P Lall	7	5	5
4	K Rosewall F Stolle	5	7	3

Bottom Half

First Round					Second Round					Quarterfinals					Semifinals

3	R Lutz S Smith	6	6
	H-J Plötz R Russell	2	1		3	R Lutz S Smith	4	3
	A Ashe D Ralston	7	6			A Ashe D Ralston	6	6
	I El Shafei T Ulrich	5	3								A Ashe D Ralston	7	6
	I Buding J Fillol	4	6	5							R Emerson R Laver	5	4
	Ž Franulović N Pilić	6	3	3		I Buding J Fillol	1	4
						R Emerson R Laver	6	6
																A Ashe D Ralston	7	4	6
																A Gimeno M Santana	5	6	3
						C Graebner R Holmberg	5	5
						A Gimeno M Santana	7	7
											A Gimeno M Santana	6	5	6
											J Kodeš J Loyo-Mayo	3	7	3
						J Kodeš J Loyo-Mayo	7	3	5
					1	J Newcombe T Roche	5	6	4

gollark: As if that's possible.

gollark: Fearsome.

gollark: I might have to release apioforms from the beecloud.

gollark: It must comfort you to think so.

gollark: > There is burgeoning interest in designing AI-basedsystems to assist humans in designing computing systems,including tools that automatically generate computer code.The most notable of these comes in the form of the first self-described ‘AI pair programmer’, GitHub Copilot, a languagemodel trained over open-source GitHub code. However, codeoften contains bugs—and so, given the vast quantity of unvettedcode that Copilot has processed, it is certain that the languagemodel will have learned from exploitable, buggy code. Thisraises concerns on the security of Copilot’s code contributions.In this work, we systematically investigate the prevalence andconditions that can cause GitHub Copilot to recommend insecurecode. To perform this analysis we prompt Copilot to generatecode in scenarios relevant to high-risk CWEs (e.g. those fromMITRE’s “Top 25” list). We explore Copilot’s performance onthree distinct code generation axes—examining how it performsgiven diversity of weaknesses, diversity of prompts, and diversityof domains. In total, we produce 89 different scenarios forCopilot to complete, producing 1,692 programs. Of these, wefound approximately 40 % to be vulnerable.Index Terms—Cybersecurity, AI, code generation, CWE

References

Draw

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.