1969 U.S. Professional Indoor – Singles
Manuel Santana was the defending champion, but did not participate this year.
Singles | |
---|---|
1969 U.S. Professional Indoor | |
Champion | ![]() |
Runner-up | ![]() |
Final score | 7–5, 6–4, 6–4 |
Draw | 32 |
Rod Laver won the title, defeating Tony Roche 7–5, 6–4, 6–4 in the final.
Seeds
Rod Laver (Champion) Arthur Ashe (First Round) Tony Roche (Final) Ken Rosewall (Semifinals) John Newcombe (Second Round) Tom Okker (Semifinals) Richard Pancho Gonzales (Quarterfinals) Roy Emerson (First Round)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Finals
Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||
4 | ![]() | 4 | 2 | ||||||||||||
1 | ![]() | 7 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||
3 | ![]() | 5 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||
3 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||
6 | ![]() | 1 | 4 | ||||||||||||
Top Half
First Round | Second Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 3 | 1 | 1 | ![]() | 6 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 4 | 12 | ![]() | 1 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 6 | 14 | 1 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 6 | 3 | 6 | ![]() | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 4 | 6 | 4 | ![]() | 2 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | ![]() | 3 | 2 | 1 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 | ![]() | 6 | 5 | 6 | 4 | ![]() | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 2 | 7 | 2 | 5 | ![]() | 5 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 6 | 3 | 0 | ![]() | 7 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 4 | 6 | 6 | ![]() | 3 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 4 | 5 | 4 | ![]() | 6 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 6 | 7 | ![]() | 4 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 1 | 4 | 4 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() | 6 | 6 |
Bottom Half
First Round | Second Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 4 | 2 | 3 | ![]() | 9 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 2 | 2 | ![]() | 8 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 6 | 6 | 3 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 7 | 3 | 9 | 7 | ![]() | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 5 | 6 | 7 | ![]() | 3 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 3 | 6 | 2 | 7 | ![]() | 6 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
7 | ![]() | 6 | 3 | 6 | 3 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||
6 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | 6 | ![]() | 1 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 3 | 3 | 6 | ![]() | 4 | 6 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() | 6 | 3 | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 3 | 3 | 6 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() | 3 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 4 | 3 | ![]() | 2 | 6 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 6 | 4 | 6 | ![]() | 6 | 2 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() | 4 | 6 | 2 |
gollark: Well, it's definitely not a good *summary*.
gollark: That doesn't seem particularly sensical, which I suppose you might expect for anything randomly pulled out of a long video.
gollark: You *really* like saying "boomer papers", don't you.
gollark: It's "not real" in the sense that numbers and differential equations and perfectly accurate triangles and such do not exist in reality, but do allow you to make really good models of it.
gollark: Spirit-grade insults aren't trivial either.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.