1969 Buenos Aires tennis tournament – Singles

François Jauffret defeated Željko Franulović 3-6, 6-2, 6-4, 6-3 to win the 1969 Buenos Aires tennis tournament singles competition. Roy Emerson was the defending champion.

Main article: 1969 Buenos Aires tennis tournament

Draw

Final
Final
  François Jauffret 3 6 6 6  
  Željko Franulović 6 2 4 3  

Section 1
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
  R Emerson          
              R Emerson 2 6 6 6  
  J Pinto-Bravo 6 6 6       J Pinto-Bravo 6 2 2 4  
  1 3 4       R Emerson 5 6 6 6  
  I Buding 6 6 6       I Buding 7 1 4 4  
  P Apey 2 2 3       I Buding 7 6 6    
  E Mandarino 6 8 6       E Mandarino 5 3 2    
  3 6 2       R Emerson 2 3 4    
  J Fillol Sr. 6 6 6       F Jauffret 6 6 6    
  2 2 2       J Fillol Sr. 6 6 5 4  
  J Kodeš 6 6 6       J Kodeš 4 8 7 6  
  H Romani 2 2 1       J Kodeš 5 0 10    
  F Jauffret 6 7 6       F Jauffret 7 6 12    
  E Soriano 1 5 1       F Jauffret 6 6 6    
  J Ganzábal 6 8 6       J Ganzábal 4 3 2    
  L Álvarez 1 6 4    

Section 2
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
  G Vilas 7 6 6    
  F McMillan 5 1 2       G Vilas 6 4 4 6 6
  P Cornejo 6 4 6 6     P Cornejo 1 6 6 4 4
  4 6 4 3     G Vilas 4 1 2    
  N Kalogeropoulos 6 3 6 6     Z Franulović 6 6 6    
  3 6 1 3     N Kalogeropoulos 1 2 1    
  Z Franulović 9 10 7       Z Franulović 6 6 6    
  7 8 5       Z Franulović 6 7 6    
  A Molina 4 6 5 6 6   C Richey 3 5 0    
  J C Rodríguez 6 1 7 4 3   A Molina 7 1 6 11 6
  M Holeček 6 6 6       M Holeček 9 6 3 9 2
  L Ayala 1 2 2       A Molina 2 4 2    
  J Velasco, Sr. 3 5 4       C Richey 6 6 6    
  T Lynch 6 7 3       J Velasco, Sr. 2 6 3 3  
  C Richey 6 6 6       C Richey 6 2 6 6  
  0 2 0    
gollark: No, this is merely mgollark's insanity showing.
gollark: > The only thing I can do is use C, but it's not like Rust is particularly excellent and amazing.OH BEE OH BEE IT NEEDS RETRAINING
gollark: > , yes.<|endoftext|>It's a shame that many languages have weird implicit typing.<|endoftext|>The only thing I can do is use C, but it's not like Rust is particularly excellent and amazing.<|endoftext|>The language is very hostile to abstraction and stuff, as far as I know.<|endoftext|>I think it's a good way to write C.<|endoftext|>It was a good job of some kind to push the language to write C.<|endoftext|>We had that one yesterday, yes.<|endoftext|>It is not a good reason to write C.<|endoftext|>Apparently the actual language is now overcrowded because of its 900-letter TLDs.<|endoftext|>It's a shame that the platform doesn't match the original definition you want to use the actual *C*.<|endoftext|>No, it's a *c*.<|endoftext|>It would be better if it used actual definition of `set shell.<|endoftext|>What?<|endoftext|>https://github.com/dangr/fastcNONE are safe from gollarious emulation.
gollark: This is a flawless method of comparing information density, yes, before you ask.
gollark: Emojis are encoded in 3-4ish bytes. I analyzed average word length in my notes and found that it was about 5.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.