1961–62 Landsdelsserien
The 1961–62 Landsdelsserien was a Norwegian second-tier football league season, the last named Landsdelsserien.
Season | 1961–62 |
---|---|
Promoted | Sarpsborg Gjøvik-Lyn |
Relegated | 45 teams |
← 1960–61 |
The league was contested by 55 teams, divided into a total of seven groups from four districts; Østland/Søndre, Østland/Nordre, Sørland/Vestre and Møre/Trøndelag.[1] The seven group winners qualified for promotion play-offs to compete for two spots in the 1963 1. divisjon. Sarpsborg and Gjøvik-Lyn won the play-offs and were promoted to the top flight. Due to a format change in the league system, 45 teams were relegated to the 1963 3. divisjon.
Tables
District Østland/Søndre
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Qualification or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Sarpsborg (O, P) | 21 | 16 | 2 | 3 | 64 | 19 | +45 | 34 | Qualification for the promotion play-offs |
2 | Østsiden | 21 | 12 | 3 | 6 | 46 | 27 | +19 | 27 | |
3 | Sparta (R) | 21 | 11 | 4 | 6 | 43 | 32 | +11 | 26 | Qualification for the relegation play-offs |
4 | Rapid (R) | 21 | 11 | 4 | 6 | 37 | 39 | −2 | 26 | Relegation to 3. divisjon |
5 | Pors (R) | 21 | 7 | 4 | 10 | 36 | 43 | −7 | 18 | |
6 | Moss (R) | 21 | 7 | 3 | 11 | 28 | 30 | −2 | 17 | |
7 | Fram (R) | 21 | 5 | 5 | 11 | 34 | 42 | −8 | 15 | |
8 | Heddal (R) | 21 | 1 | 3 | 17 | 14 | 70 | −56 | 5 |
Source: rsssf.no
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(O) Play-off winner; (P) Promoted; (R) Relegated.
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(O) Play-off winner; (P) Promoted; (R) Relegated.
District Østland/Nordre
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Qualification or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Gjøvik-Lyn (O, P) | 21 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 49 | 32 | +17 | 30 | Qualification for the promotion play-offs |
2 | Lillestrøm | 21 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 60 | 47 | +13 | 27 | |
3 | Raufoss (O) | 21 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 40 | 39 | +1 | 23 | Qualification for the relegation play-offs |
4 | Strømmen (R) | 21 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 27 | 26 | +1 | 23 | Relegation to 3. divisjon |
5 | Asker (R) | 21 | 8 | 3 | 10 | 48 | 33 | +15 | 19 | |
6 | Aurskog (R) | 21 | 7 | 5 | 9 | 40 | 47 | −7 | 19 | |
7 | Mjøndalen (R) | 21 | 7 | 1 | 13 | 47 | 57 | −10 | 15 | |
8 | Hamarkameratene (R) | 21 | 4 | 4 | 13 | 31 | 61 | −30 | 12 |
Source: rsssf.no
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(O) Play-off winner; (P) Promoted; (R) Relegated.
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(O) Play-off winner; (P) Promoted; (R) Relegated.
District Sørland/Vestland
Group A
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Qualification or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Start | 21 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 67 | 27 | +40 | 33 | Qualification for the promotion play-offs |
2 | Jerv (R) | 21 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 52 | 36 | +16 | 28 | Relegation to 3. divisjon |
3 | Grane (R) | 21 | 7 | 10 | 4 | 51 | 50 | +1 | 24 | |
4 | Flekkefjord (R) | 21 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 45 | 43 | +2 | 20 | |
5 | Vigør (R) | 21 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 46 | 47 | −1 | 20 | |
6 | Sørfjell (R) | 21 | 8 | 4 | 9 | 51 | 54 | −3 | 20 | |
7 | Vindbjart (R) | 21 | 7 | 4 | 10 | 64 | 72 | −8 | 18 | |
8 | Nedenes (R) | 21 | 1 | 3 | 17 | 33 | 80 | −47 | 5 | Relegation to 4. divisjon |
Source: rsssf.no
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(R) Relegated.
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(R) Relegated.
Group B
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Qualification or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Haugar | 21 | 15 | 1 | 5 | 54 | 28 | +26 | 31 | Qualification for the promotion play-offs |
2 | Ulf (R) | 21 | 14 | 1 | 6 | 49 | 21 | +28 | 29 | Relegation to 3. divisjon |
3 | Vard (R) | 21 | 12 | 2 | 7 | 52 | 36 | +16 | 26 | |
4 | Bryne (R) | 21 | 12 | 1 | 8 | 59 | 37 | +22 | 25 | |
5 | Jarl (R) | 21 | 10 | 1 | 10 | 34 | 47 | −13 | 21 | |
6 | Stavanger (R) | 21 | 7 | 3 | 11 | 31 | 34 | −3 | 17 | |
7 | Randaberg (R) | 21 | 6 | 4 | 11 | 30 | 48 | −18 | 16 | |
8 | Buøy (R) | 21 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 12 | 70 | −58 | 3 | Relegation to 4. divisjon |
Source: rsssf.no
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(R) Relegated.
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(R) Relegated.
Group C
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Qualification or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Os | 18 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 39 | 14 | +25 | 29 | Qualification for the promotion play-offs |
2 | Djerv (R) | 18 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 32 | 28 | +4 | 22 | Relegation to 3. divisjon |
3 | Årstad (R) | 18 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 43 | 22 | +21 | 21 | |
4 | Varegg (R) | 18 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 26 | 31 | −5 | 17 | |
5 | Trane (R) | 18 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 20 | 32 | −12 | 15 | |
6 | Fana (R) | 18 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 22 | 34 | −12 | 14 | |
7 | Nordnes (R) | 18 | 1 | 6 | 11 | 14 | 35 | −21 | 8 |
Source: rsssf.no
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(R) Relegated.
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(R) Relegated.
District Møre/Trøndelag
Møre
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Qualification or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Aalesund | 21 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 51 | 16 | +35 | 35 | Qualification for the promotion play-offs |
2 | Langevåg (R) | 21 | 13 | 4 | 4 | 65 | 31 | +34 | 30 | Relegation to 3. divisjon |
3 | Hødd (R) | 21 | 13 | 3 | 5 | 66 | 30 | +36 | 29 | |
4 | Molde (R) | 21 | 8 | 3 | 10 | 42 | 51 | −9 | 19 | |
5 | Kristiansund (R) | 21 | 8 | 2 | 11 | 39 | 43 | −4 | 18 | |
6 | Clausenengen (R) | 21 | 6 | 2 | 13 | 34 | 50 | −16 | 14 | |
7 | Braatt (R) | 21 | 5 | 4 | 12 | 35 | 64 | −29 | 14 | |
8 | Skarbøvik (R) | 21 | 4 | 1 | 16 | 31 | 78 | −47 | 9 | Relegation to 4. divisjon |
Source: rsssf.no
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(R) Relegated.
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(R) Relegated.
Trøndelag
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Qualification or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Kvik | 21 | 14 | 3 | 4 | 45 | 17 | +28 | 31 | Qualification for the promotion play-offs |
2 | Freidig (R) | 21 | 12 | 3 | 6 | 48 | 30 | +18 | 27 | Relegation to 3. divisjon |
3 | Nessegutten (R) | 21 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 44 | 35 | +9 | 24 | |
4 | Brage (R) | 21 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 40 | 34 | +6 | 23 | |
5 | Sverre (R) | 21 | 9 | 2 | 10 | 36 | 41 | −5 | 20 | |
6 | Falken (R) | 21 | 4 | 8 | 9 | 26 | 37 | −11 | 16 | |
7 | Ranheim (R) | 21 | 8 | 0 | 13 | 36 | 52 | −16 | 16 | |
8 | Verdal (R) | 21 | 4 | 3 | 14 | 32 | 61 | −29 | 11 | Relegation to 4. divisjon |
Source: rsssf.no
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(R) Relegated.
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(R) Relegated.
Promotion play-offs
First round
- Sørland/Vestland
- Results
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Qualification |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Os (O) | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 4 | +3 | 4 | Qualification for the promotion play-offs final round |
2 | Haugar | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 2 | Qualification for the 1963 2. divisjon |
3 | Start | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | −4 | 0 |
Source: rsssf.no
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(O) Play-off winner.
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(O) Play-off winner.
- Møre/Trøndelag
Aalesund won 2–0 on aggregate and qualified for the final round.
Relegation play-offs
Raufoss won 6–2 on aggregate and remained in 2. divisjon. Sparta were relegated to the 3. divisjon.
gollark: You could probably RLE them if it's a huge problem.
gollark: I generally wouldn't agree with vaguely dishonest things like that, and I don't know if anyone actually thinks that's the goal.
gollark: I suppose if you model LGBTQ+ etc. acceptance as some sort of 1D scale ranging from "persecuted heavily" to "worshiped as gods" with "general sensible acceptance" in the middle, and we're somewhere down between "persecuted" and "acceptance", then even if the target is "general sensible acceptance" it may be more effective to... market stuff? slightly more toward the "worshiped as gods" end in order to reach the middle.
gollark: Yes.
gollark: I mean, I prefer "let's learn about some historical issues regarding [GROUP]" over "[GROUP] great, let us all praise [GROUP]".
References
- Aarhus, Lars. "Landsdelsserien (second division) 1961/62". RSSSF Norway. Retrieved 14 November 2019.
- "Sesongen 61/62". ikstart.no. IK Start. Retrieved 14 November 2019.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.