1946–47 Division 2 season (Swedish ice hockey)
The 1946–47 Division 2 season was the second tier of ice hockey in Sweden for that season. 43 teams participated, divided into six groups of six and one group of seven. Group winners Gävle GIK, Leksands IF, IFK Bofors, Västerås SK, Tranebergs IF, Atlas Diesels IF, and Djurgårdens IF advanced to a promotion tournament which resulted in Gävle GIK, Västerås, Traneberg, and Atlas Diesel being promoted to Division 1 for the following season.
1946–47 Division 2 season | |
---|---|
League | |
Sport | Ice hockey |
Number of teams | 43 |
Group winners | Gävle GIK (North) Leksands IF (Dalarna) IFK Bofors (West) Västerås SK HK (Västmanland) Tranebergs IF (Södermanland) Atlas Diesels IF (East) Djurgårdens IF (South) |
Promoted to Division 1 | Gävle GIK Västerås SK Tranebergs IF Atlas Diesels IF |
Standings
North
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Promotion or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Gävle GIK (P) | 12 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 58 | 30 | +28 | 20 | Advance to promotion qualifiers |
2 | Brynäs IF | 12 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 56 | 47 | +9 | 14 | |
3 | IK Huge | 12 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 58 | 57 | +1 | 14 | |
4 | Gefle IF | 12 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 50 | 47 | +3 | 13 | |
5 | IK Warpen | 12 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 43 | 35 | +8 | 10 | |
6 | Sandvikens IF | 12 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 44 | 60 | −16 | 8 | |
7 | Strömsbro IF | 12 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 39 | 72 | −33 | 5 |
Dalarna
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Leksands IF | 10 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 83 | 23 | +60 | 18 | Advance to promotion qualifiers |
2 | IFK Rättvik | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 64 | 47 | +17 | 12 | |
3 | IK Brage | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 40 | 43 | −3 | 12 | |
4 | Hofors IK | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 54 | 50 | +4 | 9 | |
5 | Krylbo IF | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 23 | 33 | −10 | 9 | |
6 | Falu BS (R) | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 13 | 81 | −68 | 0 | Relegated |
West
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Promotion or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | IFK Bofors | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 70 | 12 | +58 | 20 | Advance to promotion qualifiers |
2 | IF Göta | 9 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 42 | 29 | +13 | 11 | |
3 | Deje IK | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 28 | 34 | −6 | 9 | |
4 | Färjestads BK (R) | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 40 | 55 | −15 | 7 | Relegated |
5 | Degerfors BK (R) | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 33 | 49 | −16 | 6 | |
6 | Grums IK (R) | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 29 | 63 | −34 | 5 |
Västmanland
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Promotion or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Västerås SK (P) | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 95 | 15 | +80 | 19 | Advance to promotion qualifiers |
2 | Surahammars IF | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 80 | 18 | +62 | 17 | |
3 | BK Forward | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 43 | 49 | −6 | 10 | |
4 | IK Westmannia | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 32 | 39 | −7 | 8 | |
5 | IFK Västerås | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 34 | 53 | −19 | 6 | |
6 | IF Eyra (R) | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 9 | 115 | −106 | 0 | Relegated |
Södermanland
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Promotion or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Tranebergs IF (P) | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 82 | 27 | +55 | 17 | Advance to promotion qualifiers |
2 | Södertälje IF | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 74 | 31 | +43 | 16 | |
3 | IF Olympia | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 40 | −5 | 11 | |
4 | Lilljanshofs IF | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 37 | 49 | −12 | 10 | |
5 | Värtans IK (R) | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 43 | 62 | −19 | 5 | Relegated |
6 | IFK Tumba (R) | 10 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 26 | 88 | −62 | 1 |
East
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Promotion or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Atlas Diesels IF (P) | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 85 | 19 | +66 | 17 | Advance to promotion qualifiers |
2 | Årsta SK | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 49 | 45 | +4 | 14 | |
3 | IFK Stockholm | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 46 | 44 | +2 | 11 | |
4 | IK Sirius | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 41 | 55 | −14 | 8 | |
5 | Kungsholms IF (R) | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 51 | 71 | −20 | 8 | Relegated |
6 | Reymersholms IK (R) | 10 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 52 | 72 | −20 | 2 |
South
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Promotion or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Djurgårdens IF | 10 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 86 | 20 | +66 | 18 | Advance to promotion qualifiers |
2 | IK Sleipner | 10 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 62 | 23 | +39 | 18 | |
3 | IFK Norrköping | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 61 | 38 | +23 | 12 | |
4 | Norrköpings AIS | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 46 | 52 | −6 | 8 | |
5 | GoIF Tjalve (R) | 10 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 27 | 84 | −57 | 4 | Relegated |
6 | BK Derby (R) | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 14 | 79 | −65 | 0 |
gollark: I will do this if I ever hook it up to something automatic and don't just have a python thing open with the model.
gollark: > Heavpoot is much like an improper integral.<|endoftext|>Maybe the x = y?<|endoftext|><|endoftext|>~play (>>=)~play (>>=)~sAs you can see, it can do advanced mathematics.
gollark: <@!160279332454006795> You ARE much like pythohazardous unicode.
gollark: > Heavpoot is much like pythohazardous unicode.<|endoftext|>The avioformic carriers are not to be tolerated, thus no.<|endoftext|>I see.<|endoftext|>Oh, I can't find the area to live.<|endoftext|>They're made of such their body and such too.<|endoftext|>I thought they had their own mass surveillance.<|endoftext|>Well, the UK rolled out a contact tracing app, so I actually have them disabled or something.<|endoftext|>The internet is really bad.<|endoftext|>Why? Did they not already have their own authentication mechanisms? That could be very hard, actually.<|endoftext|>I have a big SBC and it's not really a good one.<|endoftext|>I don't know exactly how it works, but it's nice for it.<|endoftext|>I'll look into it.<|endoftext|>I can't see any obvious ones in my website.<|endoftext|>The ones are mostly unrepairable.<|endoftext|>That would make it easier,
gollark: The law enforcement turtle is a thing, allegedly.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.