1933 U.S. National Championships – Men's Singles

Fred Perry defeated Jack Crawford 6–3, 11–13, 4–6, 6–0, 6–1 in the final to win the Men's Singles tennis title at the 1933 U.S. National Championships.[2] It was Perry's first Grand Slam title overall, and the first of three US Championships.

Men's Singles
1933 U.S. National Championships
Champion Fred Perry [1]
Runner-up Jack Crawford [1]
Final score6–3, 11–13, 4–6, 6–0, 6–1
Draw90
Seeds16

Seeds

The tournament used two lists of eight players for seeding the men's singles event; one for U.S. players and one for foreign players. Fred Perry is the champion; others show the round in which they were eliminated.[2][3]

Draw

Key

Final eight
Quarter-finals Semi-finals Final
                     
Bryan Grant 6 4 6 5
7 Lester Stoefen 8 6 3 7
7 Lester Stoefen 3 2 2
(2) Fred Perry 6 6 6
(8) Adrian Quist 4 4 0
(2) Fred Perry 6 6 6
(2) Fred Perry 6 11 4 6 6
(1) Jack Crawford 3 13 6 0 1
2 Frank Shields 6 6 4 6
8 Gregory Mangin 4 4 6 3
2 Frank Shields 5 4 3
(1) Jack Crawford 7 6 6
4 Clifford Sutter 3 3 4
(1) Jack Crawford 6 6 6

Earlier rounds

Section 1
First Round Second Round Third Round Fourth Round
1 Vines 6 6 6
Palmer 1 2 2
1 Vines 6 7 6
19 Avory 3 5 1
Pratt 2 1 3
19 Avory 6 6 6
1 Vines 3 3 3
19 Grant 6 6 6
19 Grant 8 6 6
Murphy 6 3 4
19 Grant 6 6 6
O'Loughlin 0 2 0
O'Loughlin 6 6 6
13 Ito 3 1 3

Section 2
First Round Second Round Third Round Fourth Round
13 Stoefen 6 7 6 6
Bowden 3 5 8 3
13 Stoefen 6 6 6
Alonso-Areyzaga 2 2 2
Bell 3 2 4
Alonso-Areyzaga 6 6 6
13 Stoefen 6 6 6
7 Lee 0 4 4
Case 4 2 1
Wilde 6 6 6
Wilde 4 8 3 1
7 Lee 6 6 6 6
Culley 2 6 1 2
7 Lee 6 4 6 6

Section 3
First Round Second Round Third Round Fourth Round
5 Allison 6 6 6
Kingman 3 4 4
5 Allison 4 4 6 6 6
Van Ryn 6 6 1 4 2
Lott 1 0 0
Van Ryn 6 6 6 Van Ryn 6 6 6
Covington 4 2 2 5 Allison 1 3 2
Law 6 6 4 6 15 Quist 6 6 6
Fischer 2 3 6 1 Law 3 2 4
McCauliff 6 6 6 McCauliff 6 6 6
Cameron 3 0 3 McCauliff 2 1 6
Herndon 6 6 6 4 6 15 Quist 6 6 8
Roll 1 8 4 6 3 Herndon 3 6 4 3
15 Quist 6 6 9 15 Quist 6 3 6 6
Hamm 2 4 7

Section 4
First Round Second Round Third Round Fourth Round
9 Parker 6 6 6
Verstraten 3 1 2 9 Parker 6 6 6
Goeltz 6 6 6 Goeltz 0 2 4
Challiss 3 1 3 9 Parker 6 3 9 3
Gledhill 7 7 6 6 Gledhill 4 6 11 6
Prusoff 9 5 3 2 Gledhill 11 7 4 6
Kamrath 6 7 6 Kamrath 9 5 6 4
Pitman 1 5 4 Gledhill 2 6 6 3 3
Hecht 7 6 6 3 Perry 6 4 1 6 6
Hendrix 5 3 3 Hecht 2 6 7 0 6
Williams 6 7 7 Williams 6 3 5 6 4
Macguffin 3 5 5 Hecht 1 4 4
Bryan 6 4 6 7 3 Perry 6 6 6
Hawley 2 6 3 5 Bryan 6 3 0 3
3 Perry 6 6 6 3 Perry 3 6 6 6
Burns 1 3 2

Section 5
First Round Second Round Third Round Fourth Round
3 Shields 6 6 6
Donovan 4 0 3 3 Shields 6 6 6
Nogrady 6 6 2 6 Nogrady 0 2 4
Watt 2 4 6 4 3 Shields 6 8 6
Hall 6 6 6 17 Turnbull 4 6 3
White 0 1 1 Hall 6 5 4 4
17 Turnbull 3 6 6 6 17 Turnbull 4 7 6 6
Bowman 6 2 2 1 3 Shields 7 6 6
17 Lott 6 4 6 6 10 Nunoi 5 2 3
Watt 1 6 3 1 17 Lott 6 6 6
Wood 6 6 3 6 Wood 2 0 1
Washburn 3 4 6 3 17 Lott 7 6 1 1 2
Gilpin 6 6 8 10 Nunoi 5 1 6 6 6
Dickinson 4 3 6 Gilpin 2 0 1
10 Nunoi 6 9 6 10 Nunoi 6 6 6
Jacobs 3 7 2

Section 6
First Round Second Round Third Round Fourth Round
15 Mangin 6 6 6
Kurzrok 3 1 4 15 Mangin 4 6 6 7
Lavine 4 6 5 6 6 Lavine 6 0 1 5
Flynn 6 4 7 2 3 15 Mangin 6 3 6 6
Tilden 2 6 7 6 McDiarmid 1 6 1 3
Tilney 6 4 5 1 Tilden 1 4 4
McDiarmid 6 6 6 McDiarmid 6 6 6
Kelleher 4 2 4 15 Mangin 6 3 6 4 6
Griffin 6 6 8 5 Satoh 2 6 3 6 2
O'Loughlin 1 4 6 Griffin 6 6 8
Hartman 2 3 6
Griffin 5 6 6 1 3
5 Satoh 7 4 2 6 6
Lynch 4 6 4
5 Satoh 6 8 6

Section 7
First Round Second Round Third Round Fourth Round
7 Sutter 6 6 6
Buxby 4 3 2
7 Sutter 6 7 6
Murray 1 5 2
Fischer w/o
Murray
7 Sutter 3 6 6 3 8
11 McGrath 6 4 3 6 6
De Mott 4 6 3
Davenport 6 8 6
Davenport 2 4 2
11 McGrath 6 6 6
Hines 3 7 4 4
11 McGrath 6 5 6 6

Section 8
First Round Second Round Third Round Fourth Round
11 Wood 7 6 2 6
Coughlin 5 2 6 2
11 Wood 7 9 7 6
Mako 5 7 9 3
Martin 7 8 4
Mako 9 10 6
11 Wood 4 4 6 6
1 Crawford 6 6 2 8
Tidball 6 3 6 6
Stanford 1 6 2 3
Tidball 2 8 2 5
1 Crawford 6 6 6 7
Seligson 4 3 1
1 Crawford 6 6 6
gollark: For example:- the average person probably does *some* sort of illegal/shameful/bad/whatever stuff, and if some organization has information on that it can use it against people it wants to discredit (basically, information leads to power, so information asymmetry leads to power asymmetry). This can happen if you decide to be an activist or something much later, even- having lots of data on you means you can be manipulated more easily (see, partly, targeted advertising, except that actually seems to mostly be poorly targeted)- having a government be more effective at detecting minor crimes (which reduced privacy could allow for) might *not* actually be a good thing, as some crimes (drug use, I guess?) are kind of stupid and at least somewhat tolerable because they *can't* be entirely enforced practically
gollark: No, it probably isn't your fault, it must have been dropped from my brain stack while I was writing the rest.
gollark: ... I forgot one of them, hold on while I try and reremember it.
gollark: That's probably one of them. I'm writing.
gollark: > If you oppose compromises to privacy on the grounds that you could do something that is misidentified as a crime, being more transparent does helpI mean, sure. But I worry about lacking privacy for reasons other than "maybe the government will use partial data or something and accidentally think I'm doing crimes".

References
  1. Collins, Bud (2010). The Bud Collins History of Tennis (2nd ed.). [New York City]: New Chapter Press. p. 459. ISBN 978-0942257700.
  2. Talbert, Bill (1967). Tennis Observed – The USLTA Men's Singles Champions, 1881-1966,. Barre: Barre Publishers. p. 111. OCLC 172306.
  3. Alan Gould (September 2, 1933). "Men's singles starts today". Los Angeles Times. pp. 5, 7 – via Newspapers.com. Shields is seeded No. 2, between Vines and Allison, although the big New Yorker was ranked only fifth last year. Frankie Parker, the 17-year old sensation, although only No. 12 in the ranking list, was seeded fifth, between Clifford Sutter and Sidney Wood.
Preceded by
1933 Wimbledon Championships		 Grand Slams
Men's Singles		 Succeeded by
1934 Australian Championships
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.