1932 Staten Island Stapletons season

The 1932 Staten Island Stapletons season was their fourth and final in the league. The team failed to improve on their previous output of 4–6–1, winning only two games.[1] They failed to qualify for the playoffs.

1932 Staten Island Stapletons season
Head coachHal Hanson
Home fieldThompson Stadium
Results
Record2–7–3
Division place8th NFL
Playoff finishdid not qualify

Schedule

Game Date Opponent Result Record Venue Game
Recap
1 September 25 Brooklyn Dodgers L 0–7 0–1 Thompson Stadium Recap
2 October 2 Chicago Bears T 0–0 0–1–1 Thompson Stadium Recap
3 October 9 at Brooklyn Dodgers W 7–6 1–1–1 Ebbets Field Recap
4 October 16 Portsmouth Spartans T 7–7 1–1–2 Thompson Stadium Recap
5 October 20 Portsmouth Spartans L 6–13 1–2–2 Thompson Stadium Recap
6 October 23 at Chicago Bears L 7–27 1–3–2 Wrigley Field Recap
7 October 30 at Green Bay Packers L 0–26 1–4–2 City Stadium Recap
8 November 6 at Boston Braves L 6–19 1–5–2 Braves Field Recap
9 November 13 at New York Giants L 7–27 1–6–2 Polo Grounds Recap
10 November 20 Chicago Cardinals W 21–7 2–6–2 Thompson Stadium Recap
11 November 24 New York Giants T 13–13 2–6–3 Thompson Stadium Recap
12 November 27 Green Bay Packers L 3–21 2–7–3 Thompson Stadium Recap

Standings

NFL standings
W L T PCT PF PA STK
Chicago Bears 1 7 1 6 .875 160 44 W3
Green Bay Packers 10 3 1 .769 152 63 L2
Portsmouth Spartans 1 6 2 4 .750 116 71 L1
Boston Braves 4 4 2 .500 55 79 W2
New York Giants 4 6 2 .400 93 113 L1
Brooklyn Dodgers 3 9 0 .250 63 131 L4
Chicago Cardinals 2 6 2 .250 72 114 L5
Staten Island Stapletons 2 7 3 .222 93 113 L1

Note: Tie games were not officially counted in the standings until 1972.

1 The Bears and Spartans records include the result of the 1932 NFL Playoff Game. Thus, the Spartans are ranked third with a lower winning percentage than the Packers.

gollark: Gaming or foolish Windows-only-software support is probably the best reason to use it in my opinion.
gollark: So does Linux.
gollark: Windows 7 is, well, in some ways better than 10, but I do not think it is *good*.
gollark: Ah, so we should just throw away CPU cycles because WinDoWs GoOd?
gollark: Yes, you linked it, it is apparently a mildly less bad version of Windows.

References


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.