1930 Newark Tornadoes season
The 1930 Newark Tornadoes season was their second and final in the National Football League. The team failed to improve on their previous output of 3–5–4, winning only one game.[1] Playing eight games in October and losing 6, they finished eleventh in the league.
1930 Newark Tornadoes season | |
---|---|
Head coach | Al McGall, Andy Salata, and Jack Fish |
Results | |
Record | 1–10–1 |
Division place | 11th NFL |
Schedule
Week | Date | Opponent | Result |
---|---|---|---|
1 | September 14, 1930 | at Portsmouth Spartans | L 13–6 |
2 | September 17, 1930 | New York Giants | L 32–0 |
3 | September 21, 1930 | at Staten Island Stapletons | L 12–6 |
4 | September 23, 1930 | Frankford Yellow Jackets | L 13–6 |
5 | October 1, 1930 | Staten Island Stapletons | T 7–7 |
6 | October 4, 1930 | at Frankford Yellow Jackets | W 19–0 |
7 | October 5, 1930 | at Providence Steam Roller | L 14–0 |
8 | October 8, 1930 | Chicago Cardinals | L 13–0 |
9 | October 12, 1930 | at Brooklyn Dodgers | L 32–0 |
10 | October 19, 1930 | Brooklyn Dodgers | L 14–0 |
11 | October 26, 1930 | Staten Island Stapletons | L 6–0 |
12 | October 30, 1930 | at New York Giants | L 34–7 |
Standings
NFL standings | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W | L | T | PCT | PF | PA | STK | |||
Green Bay Packers | 10 | 3 | 1 | .769 | 234 | 111 | T1 | ||
New York Giants | 13 | 4 | 0 | .765 | 308 | 98 | L1 | ||
Chicago Bears | 9 | 4 | 1 | .692 | 169 | 71 | W5 | ||
Brooklyn Dodgers | 7 | 4 | 1 | .636 | 154 | 59 | L1 | ||
Providence Steam Roller | 6 | 4 | 1 | .600 | 90 | 125 | L1 | ||
Staten Island Stapletons | 5 | 5 | 2 | .500 | 95 | 112 | L1 | ||
Chicago Cardinals | 5 | 6 | 2 | .455 | 128 | 132 | L1 | ||
Portsmouth Spartans | 5 | 6 | 3 | .455 | 176 | 161 | T1 | ||
Frankford Yellow Jackets | 4 | 13 | 1 | .235 | 113 | 321 | T1 | ||
Minneapolis Red Jackets | 1 | 7 | 1 | .125 | 27 | 165 | L6 | ||
Newark Tornadoes | 1 | 10 | 1 | .091 | 51 | 190 | L6 |
Note: Tie games were not officially counted in the standings until 1972.
gollark: ?news
gollark: Consequentialist-ly speaking (yes, I am aware you don't subscribe to this) a technological development could be "bad", if the majority of the possible uses for it are negative, or it's most likely to be used for negative things. To what extent any technology actually falls into that is a separate issue though.
gollark: You can show that 2 + 2 = 4 follows from axioms, and that the system allows you to define useful mathematical tools to model reality.
gollark: If you're going to say something along the lines of "see how it deals with [SCENARIO] and rate that by [OTHER STANDARD]", this doesn't work because it sneaks in [OTHER STANDARD] as a more fundamental underlying ethical system.
gollark: I don't see how you can empirically test your ethics like you can a scientific theory.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.