1929 Australian Championships – Women's Doubles

First-seeded Daphne Akhurst and Louie Bickerton defeated the second seeds Sylvia Harper and Meryl O'Hara Wood 6–2, 3–6, 6–2 in the final, to win the Women's Doubles tennis title at the 1929 Australian Championships.[1][2][3][4][5][6]

Women's Doubles
1929 Australian Championships
Champions Daphne Akhurst
Louie Bickerton
Runners-up Sylvia Harper
Meryl O'Hara Wood
Final score6–2, 3–6, 6–2
Draw12
Seeds4

Miss Akhurst completed her third and last Triple Crown, having won Women's Singles title earlier that day and Mixed Doubles final the day before.[7]

Seeds

Draw

Key

Draw

First Round Quarterfinals Semifinals Final
2 Sylvia Harper
Meryl O'Hara Wood
6 6
Edna Lawrence
Mrs. W. T. Rowe [a]
0 1
2 Sylvia Harper
Meryl O'Hara Wood
7 6
Birdie Bond
Sydney Hocking
4 6 6 3 Kathleen Le Messurier
Dorothy Weston
5 2
Gwen Griffiths
Vera Mathias
6 4 4 Birdie Bond
Sydney Hocking
4 8 4
3 Kathleen Le Messurier
Dorothy Weston
6 6 3 Kathleen Le Messurier
Dorothy Weston
6 6 6
Eileen Rischbieth
Roma Wadey
4 0 2 Sylvia Harper
Meryl O'Hara Wood
2 6 2
1 Daphne Akhurst
Louie Bickerton
6 3 6
4 Emily Hood
Mall Molesworth
6 6
Edna Collison
Joyce Hone
0 1
4 Emily Hood
Mall Molesworth
2 2
Lorna Bollen
Anna Menz
3 6 6 1 Daphne Akhurst
Louie Bickerton
6 6
Bertha Kay
Margaret Taylor
6 2 4 Lorna Bollen
Anna Menz
3 2
1 Daphne Akhurst
Louie Bickerton
6 6 1 Daphne Akhurst
Louie Bickerton
6 6
Joyce Lillecrapp
Katherine Wemyss
2 0

Notes

gollark: You're killing something but it isn't necessarily a "baby", please do not get into this now, etc.
gollark: I can't really be bothered to read this in much detail, but the paper is specifically about poly*gyny* and is apparently not correcting for other factors involved (correlation isn't causation and all).
gollark: In what way? As in, we evolved doing that?
gollark: To be fair, 99% of what people insist is logic in arguments is not actual logic.
gollark: It's fine as long as they agree to sign over their gelatin content before they die.

References

  1. "Lawn Tennis". The Advertiser (Adelaide). South Australia, Australia. 21 January 1929. p. 23 via National Library of Australia.
  2. "Lawn Tennis". The Advertiser (Adelaide). South Australia, Australia. 22 January 1929. p. 8 via National Library of Australia.
  3. "Sparkling Tennis". The Advertiser (Adelaide). South Australia, Australia. 23 January 1929. p. 25 via National Library of Australia.
  4. "Matches In Tennis Singles Cause Great Thrills". The Register News-Pictorial. South Australia, Australia. 24 January 1929. p. 12 via National Library of Australia.
  5. "Class Tennis Now Being Shown In Australian Championships". The Register News-Pictorial. South Australia, Australia. 25 January 1929. p. 12 via National Library of Australia.
  6. "Championship Tennis". The Advertiser (Adelaide). South Australia, Australia. 28 January 1929. p. 19 via National Library of Australia.
  7. "Lawn Tennis Finals". The Advertiser (Adelaide). South Australia, Australia. 29 January 1929. p. 16 via National Library of Australia.

Source for seedings

Preceded by
1933 U.S. National Championships – Women's Doubles
Grand Slam women's doubles Succeeded by
1928 French Championships – Women's Doubles
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.