1924 Minneapolis Marines season
The 1924 Minneapolis Marines season was their fourth in the league and final as the Marines. The team failed to improve on their previous output of 2–5–2, losing six games.[1] They tied for sixteenth place in the league.
1924 Minneapolis Marines season | |
---|---|
Head coach | Joe Brandy |
Home field | Nicollet Park |
Results | |
Record | 0–6 |
League place | T-16th in NFL |
Schedule
Week | Date | Opponent | Result |
---|---|---|---|
1 | October 5, 1924 | Duluth Kelleys | L 3–0 |
2 | October 12, 1924 | at Chicago Cardinals | L 13–0 |
3 | October 26, 1924 | at Green Bay Packers | L 19–0 |
4 | November 2, 1924 | Duluth Kelleys | L 6–0 |
5 | November 9, 1924 | at Milwaukee Badgers | L 28–7 |
6 | November 15, 1924 | at Frankford Yellow Jackets | L 39–7 |
Standings
NFL standings | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W | L | T | PCT | PF | PA | STK | |||
Cleveland Bulldogs | 7 | 1 | 1 | .875 | 229 | 60 | W2 | ||
Chicago Bears | 6 | 1 | 4 | .857 | 136 | 55 | W3 | ||
Frankford Yellow Jackets | 11 | 2 | 1 | .846 | 326 | 109 | W8 | ||
Duluth Kelleys | 5 | 1 | 0 | .833 | 56 | 16 | W1 | ||
Rock Island Independents | 5 | 2 | 2 | .714 | 88 | 38 | L1 | ||
Green Bay Packers | 7 | 4 | 0 | .636 | 108 | 38 | L1 | ||
Racine Legion | 4 | 3 | 3 | .571 | 69 | 47 | W1 | ||
Chicago Cardinals | 5 | 4 | 1 | .556 | 90 | 67 | L1 | ||
Buffalo Bisons | 6 | 5 | 0 | .545 | 120 | 140 | L3 | ||
Columbus Tigers | 4 | 4 | 0 | .500 | 91 | 68 | L1 | ||
Hammond Pros | 2 | 2 | 1 | .500 | 18 | 45 | W2 | ||
Milwaukee Badgers | 5 | 8 | 0 | .385 | 142 | 188 | L2 | ||
Akron Pros | 2 | 6 | 0 | .250 | 59 | 132 | W1 | ||
Dayton Triangles | 2 | 6 | 0 | .250 | 45 | 148 | L6 | ||
Kansas City Blues | 2 | 7 | 0 | .222 | 46 | 124 | L2 | ||
Kenosha Maroons | 0 | 4 | 1 | .000 | 12 | 117 | L2 | ||
Minneapolis Marines | 0 | 6 | 0 | .000 | 14 | 108 | L6 | ||
Rochester Jeffersons | 0 | 7 | 0 | .000 | 7 | 156 | L7 |
Note: Tie games were not officially counted in the standings until 1972.
gollark: He's just saying that to keep you complacent.
gollark: No, ZFS, I mean.
gollark: I don't have ECC RAM, which it *apparently* needs, or vast quantities of RAM, which it almost certainly needs, or much of a need for more complicated solutions.
gollark: My data is replicated between my servers instead of being network-filesystemed or whatever.
gollark: Using a NAS would probably introduce extra latency. That would be bad.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.