1906 Campeonato Carioca

The 1906 Campeonato Carioca, the first edition of that championship, kicked off on May 3, 1906 and ended on October 28, 1906. It was organized by LMF (Liga Metropolitana de Football, or Metropolitan Football League). Six teams participated. Fluminense won the title for the 1st time. no teams were relegated.[1][2]

Campeonato Carioca
Season1906
ChampionsFluminense
Matches played30
Goals scored134 (4.47 per match)
Top goalscorerHorácio Costa Santos (Fluminense) – 18 goals
Biggest home winFluminense 8-0 Botafogo (May 13, 1906)
Biggest away winFootball & Athletic 0-11 Fluminense (September 9, 1906)
Highest scoringFootball & Athletic 0-11 Fluminense (September 9, 1906)
1907

Participating teams

ClubHome locationPrevious season
BotafogoBotafogo, Rio de Janeiro
BanguBangu, Rio de Janeiro
FluminenseLaranjeiras, Rio de Janeiro
Football & AthleticAndaraí, Rio de Janeiro
PaissanduFlamengo, Rio de Janeiro
Rio CricketPraia Grande, Niterói

System

The tournament would be disputed in a double round-robin format, with the team with the most points winning the title. The last-placed team would dispute a playoff against the champion of the second level.[2][1]

Championship

Pos Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts Qualification or relegation
1 Fluminense 10 9 0 1 52 6 +46 18 Champions
2 Paysandu 10 7 0 3 26 12 +14 14
3 Rio Cricket 10 6 0 4 23 9 +14 12
4 Botafogo 10 4 0 6 18 34 16 8
5 Bangu 10 3 0 7 13 18 5 6
6 Football & Athletic 10 1 0 9 2 55 53 2 Relegation Playoffs
Updated to match(es) played on October 28, 1906. Source: RSSSF.com
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) wins; 4) number of goals scored.

Relegation Playoffs

Football & Athletic5 – 2Riachuelo
John Walmsley
J. Allen
Botafogo
Barroso Magno
Referee: W. Salmond
gollark: Probably. The main issue I can see is that you would have to rewrite the entire metadata block on changes, because start/end in XTMF are offsets from the metadata region's end.
gollark: I thought about that, but:- strings in a binary format will be about the same length- integers will have some space saving, but I don't think it's very significant- it would, in a custom one, be harder to represent complex objects and stuff, which some extensions may be use- you could get some savings by removing strings like "title" which XTMF repeats a lot, but at the cost of it no longer being self-describing, making extensions harder and making debugging more annoying- I am not convinced that metadata size is a significant issue
gollark: I mean, "XTMF with CBOR/msgpack and compression" was being considered as a hypothetical "XTMF2", but I'd definitely want something, well, self-describing.
gollark: Also also, why a binary format?
gollark: Also, XTMF can do runtime update, you just need to allocate, say, 4KB at the start of the tape, and write metadata to that. The offsets might be fiddly, though.

References

  1. "RSSSF – Championship of Rio de Janeiro 1906". Retrieved July 22, 2019.
  2. "Futebolnacional.com.br – Championship of Rio de Janeiro 1906". Archived from the original on November 7, 2017. Retrieved July 22, 2019.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.