1893 Invercargill mayoral election
The 1893 Invercargill mayoral election was held on 29 November 1893 as part of that years local elections.
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Turnout | 571 | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Incumbent mayor Duncan McFarlane was defeated, coming third behind Andrew Raeside and former unofficial mayor Aaron Blacke.
Results
The following table gives the election results:[1]
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Independent | Andrew Raeside | 225 | 39.40 | ||
Independent | Aaron Blacke | 180 | 31.52 | ||
Independent | Duncan McFarlane | 126 | 22.06 | -34.47 | |
Independent | Storie | 40 | 7.00 | ||
Majority | 45 | 7.88 | |||
Turnout | 571 |
gollark: > to work.<|endoftext|>What if the rules specify English grammar but not the interpreter?<|endoftext|>It's not.<|endoftext|>You can't just not be an interpreter.<|endoftext|>I mean, it's somewhat more "open to" than "actually encoding English", but you know.<|endoftext|>You said speech canNOT be implemented by users.<|endoftext|>It's not very interesting and you can't just not actually use it.<|endoftext|>I would prefer to just use a " editor" to follow more, but that doesn't make it *obinitely* a good thing.<|endoftext|>It is not!<|endoftext|>That is not what it is in the programming language.<|endoftext|>No, I mean, you can use python as a language, but it's a good language.<|endoftext|>[BACKTICKS EXPUNGED]python↑ sample output (`<|endoftext|>` is a delimiter of some sort)
gollark: After several hours training on Google GPUs that they let random people use for some reason, the model generates grammatically correct but nonsensical sentences.
gollark: It's very easy because someone else already did basically all the work and I just had to write a script to dump my Discord data package into a CSV file with pings and DMs scrubbed out.
gollark: My evil plan to train a small GPT-2 model on my Discord messages has begun.
gollark: Yes. But you shouldn't.
References
- "MAYORAL ELECTIONS". The Star. Papers Past. 30 November 1893.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.