1893–94 Scottish Football League

Statistics of the Scottish Football League in season 1893–94.

Overview

Celtic became Scottish Division One champions. Renton were relegated, Dundee and Leith Athletic re-elected to Division One.

Clyde were elected to Division One, Hibernian and Cowlairs remained in the Scottish Division Two. Port Glasgow Athletic were docked seven points for fielding an ineligible player.

Scottish League Division One

Pos Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts
1 Celtic (C) 18 14 1 3 53 32 +21 29
2 Heart of Midlothian 18 11 4 3 46 32 +14 26
3 St Bernard's 18 11 1 6 53 39 +14 23
4 Rangers 18 8 4 6 44 30 +14 20
5 Dumbarton 18 7 5 6 32 35 3 19
6 St Mirren 18 7 3 8 49 47 +2 17
7 Third Lanark 18 7 3 8 38 44 6 17
8 Dundee 18 6 3 9 47 59 12 15
9 Leith Athletic 18 4 2 12 36 46 10 10
10 Renton 18 1 2 15 23 57 34 4
Source: worldfootball.net, Scottish Professional Football League
Rules for classification: Points system: 2 points for a win, 1 point for a draw, 0 points for a loss.
(C) Champion.

Scottish League Division Two

Pos Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts Qualification or relegation
1 Hibernian (C) 18 13 3 2 83 29 +54 29
2 Cowlairs 18 13 1 4 72 32 +40 27
3 Clyde (P) 18 11 2 5 51 36 +15 24 Elected to 1894–95 Scottish Division One
4 Motherwell 18 11 1 6 61 46 +15 23
5 Partick Thistle 18 10 0 8 56 58 2 20
6 Port Glasgow Athletic 18 9 2 7 52 52 0 13[lower-alpha 1]
7 Abercorn 18 5 2 11 42 60 18 12
8 Morton 18 4 1 13 36 62 26 9 Re-elected
8 Northern 18 3 3 12 29 66 37 9 Not re-elected[lower-alpha 2]
10 Thistle 18 2 3 13 31 72 41 7 Did not apply for re-election[lower-alpha 2]
Updated to match(es) played on unknown. Source: statto.com, SFHA
Rules for classification: Teams finish equal if level on points. Points system: 2 points for a win, 1 point for a draw, 0 points for a loss.
(C) Champion; (P) Promoted.
Notes:
  1. Port Glasgow Athletic were deducted 7 points for fielding an ineligible player.
  2. Northern were not re-elected and Thistle did not apply for re-election. Dundee Wanderers and Airdrieonians were elected in their place.
gollark: Well, yes, but we'd lose all existing programs, produce piles of specialized tooling, and do tons of extra work.
gollark: Yes.
gollark: Plus inevitably there will be subtle incompatibilities and it won't be plug-and-play.
gollark: Is it going to just send a description of what to draw? In that case, lots of overhead and problems porting to different environments since for example each GUI framework will end up needing its own module communication layer.
gollark: For one thing, is a module just going to be allowed somehow to draw on the region of the screen it's meant to be set up for?

See also

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.