1880 Troy Trojans season
The 1880 Troy Trojans improved slightly from the previous season, finishing with a 41–42 record and in 4th place in the National League.
1880 Troy Trojans | |
---|---|
Major League affiliations | |
| |
Location | |
| |
Other information | |
Manager(s) | Bob Ferguson |
< Previous season Next season > |
Regular season
Season standings
National League | W | L | Pct. | GB | Home | Road |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chicago White Stockings | 67 | 17 | 0.798 | — | 37–5 | 30–12 |
Providence Grays | 52 | 32 | 0.619 | 15 | 31–12 | 21–20 |
Cleveland Blues | 47 | 37 | 0.560 | 20 | 24–19 | 23–18 |
Troy Trojans | 41 | 42 | 0.494 | 25½ | 20–21 | 21–21 |
Worcester Worcesters | 40 | 43 | 0.482 | 26½ | 24–17 | 16–26 |
Boston Red Caps | 40 | 44 | 0.476 | 27 | 25–17 | 15–27 |
Buffalo Bisons | 24 | 58 | 0.293 | 42 | 13–28 | 11–30 |
Cincinnati Stars | 21 | 59 | 0.263 | 44 | 14–25 | 7–34 |
Record vs. opponents
1880 National League Records Sources: | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Team | BOS | BUF | CHI | CIN | CLE | PRV | TRO | WOR | |||||||||
Boston | — | 9–3–1 | 3–9 | 7–5 | 5–7 | 5–7–1 | 7–5 | 4–8 | |||||||||
Buffalo | 3–9–1 | — | 1–11 | 5–5–2 | 3–9 | 2–10 | 1–11 | 9–3 | |||||||||
Chicago | 9–3 | 11–1 | — | 10–2–1 | 8–4 | 9–3–1 | 10–2 | 10–2 | |||||||||
Cincinnati | 5–7 | 5–5–2 | 2–10–1 | — | 3–9 | 2–10 | 1–10 | 3–8 | |||||||||
Cleveland | 7–5 | 9–3 | 4–8 | 9–3 | — | 3–9 | 9–3 | 6–6–1 | |||||||||
Providence | 7–5–1 | 10–2 | 3–9–1 | 10–2 | 9–3 | — | 7–5 | 6–6–1 | |||||||||
Troy | 5–7 | 11–1 | 2–10 | 10–1 | 3–9 | 5–7 | — | 5–7 | |||||||||
Worcester | 8–4 | 3–9 | 2–10 | 8–3 | 6–6–1 | 6–6–1 | 7–5 | — |
Roster
1880 Troy Trojans | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Roster | |||||||||
Pitchers | Catchers | Infielders | Outfielders | Manager |
Player stats
Batting
Starters by position
Note: Pos = Position; G = Games played; AB = At bats; H = Hits; Avg. = Batting average; HR = Home runs; RBI = Runs batted in
Pos | Player | G | AB | H | Avg. | HR | RBI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | Bill Holbert | 60 | 212 | 40 | .189 | 0 | 8 |
1B | Ed Cogswell | 47 | 209 | 63 | .301 | 0 | 13 |
2B | Bob Ferguson | 82 | 332 | 87 | .262 | 0 | 22 |
3B | Roger Connor | 83 | 340 | 113 | .332 | 3 | 42 |
SS | Ed Caskin | 82 | 333 | 75 | .225 | 0 | 28 |
OF | John Cassidy | 83 | 352 | 89 | .253 | 0 | 29 |
OF | Pete Gillespie | 82 | 346 | 84 | .243 | 2 | 24 |
OF | Jake Evans | 47 | 180 | 46 | .256 | 0 | 22 |
Other batters
Note: G = Games played; AB = At bats; H = Hits; Avg. = Batting average; HR = Home runs; RBI = Runs batted in
Player | G | AB | H | Avg. | HR | RBI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bill Tobin | 33 | 136 | 22 | .162 | 0 | 8 |
Buttercup Dickerson | 30 | 119 | 23 | .193 | 0 | 10 |
Buck Ewing | 13 | 45 | 8 | .178 | 0 | 5 |
Bill Harbridge | 9 | 27 | 10 | .370 | 0 | 2 |
Dan Brouthers | 3 | 12 | 2 | .167 | 0 | 1 |
Joe Straub | 3 | 12 | 3 | .250 | 0 | 3 |
Mike Lawlor | 4 | 9 | 1 | .111 | 0 | 0 |
James Haley | 2 | 7 | 0 | .000 | 0 | 0 |
Dick Higham | 1 | 5 | 1 | .200 | 0 | 0 |
Bill Ahearn | 1 | 4 | 1 | .250 | 0 | 0 |
Fatty Briody | 1 | 4 | 0 | .000 | 0 | 0 |
Pitching
Starting pitchers
Note: G = Games pitched; IP = Innings pitched; W = Wins; L = Losses; ERA = Earned run average; SO = Strikeouts
Player | G | IP | W | L | ERA | SO |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mickey Welch | 65 | 574 | 34 | 30 | 2.54 | 123 |
Tim Keefe | 12 | 105 | 6 | 6 | 0.86 | 43 |
Terry Larkin | 5 | 38 | 0 | 5 | 8.76 | 5 |
Frank Mountain | 2 | 17 | 1 | 1 | 5.29 | 2 |
Relief pitchers
Note: G = Games pitched; W = Wins; L = Losses; SV = Saves; ERA = Earned run average; SO = Strikeouts
Player | G | W | L | SV | ERA | SO |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jake Evans | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13.50 | 0 |
gollark: For all the "instability" of Arch, it doesn't randomly do that.
gollark: Is anything below `ghc` in the stack implementation details to you?
gollark: The machine code for them is excessively complex too, now, but I suppose you mostly write Haskell and whatnot which is then compiled to that.
gollark: They have ridiculously complex manufacturing processes because the transistors are on the scale of a few hundred atoms, it's crazy.
gollark: Also, with your processor comment, you are kind of underselling the complexity involved. It's not separate transistors, they're all just made on large bits of silicon together and wired up. Billions of them per processor.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.