1
1
So my dad bought a TP-Link router (Model No. TL-WA7510N) which apparently has a transmitting range of 1km; and he believes that it also has a receiving range of 1km.
So he's arguing with me that the router (which is a trans-receiver) can communicate with any device in the range of 1km whether or not that device has a transmitting range of 1km.
To put it graphically:
+----+ 1km +----+
| |------------------------------------------------->| |
| TR | | TR |
| | <----| |
+----+ 100m+----+
So here's the problem:
- The two devices are 1km apart.
- The first device has a transmitting range of 1km.
- The second device only has a transmitting range of 100m.
According to my dad the two devices can talk to each other. He says that the first device has a transmitting and a receiving range of 1km which means that it can both send data to devices 1km away and receive data from devices 1km away.
To me this makes no sense. If the second device can only send data to devices 100m away then how can the first device catch the transmission?
He further argues that for bidirectional communication both the sender and the reciver should have overlapping areas of transmission:
According to him if two devices have an overlapping area of transmission then they can communicate. Here neither device has enough transmission power to reach the other. However they have enough receiving power to capture the transmission.
Obviously this makes absolutely no sense to me. How can a device sense a transmission which hasn't even reached it yet and go out, capture it and bring it back it. To me a trans-receiver only has a transmission power. It has zero receiving power.
Hence for two devices to be able to communicate bidirectionally, the diagram should look like:
Hence, from my point of view, both the devices should have a transmission range far enough to reach the other for bidirectional communication to be possible; but no matter how much I try to explain to my dad he adamantly disagrees.
So, to put an end to this debate once and for all, who is correct? Is there even such a thing as a receiving range? Can a device fetch a transmission that would otherwise never reach it? I would like a canonical answer on this.
It seems like this notion of a "transmitting range" is something you guys made up. There is no such concept. The documentation for your router doesn't specify a "transmitting range" anywhere that I could find. (And a Google search for
"TL-WA7510N" "transmitting range"
finds this question and not much else.) – David Schwartz – 2017-10-24T08:05:05.563Where does it say
– nixda – 2014-06-01T09:53:53.0231 km range?
The user guide on page 110 saysup to 26.5 km in outdoor conditions
@nixda: The manual says you can configure it for 26 KM. You can write anything you want in the manual. It's bogus. No Wifi AP is going to work over that distance without directional antenna's on either end and far more transmission power on both sides than is legal in any country. – Tonny – 2014-06-01T15:10:11.170
@Tonny I'm very aware of this. But again: Where does the 1 km came from? Apparently not from the user guide / data sheet (that's why I quoted it) – nixda – 2014-06-01T15:43:34.863