Find vs Findstr results

1

1

Per this answer I was attempting to use findstr to locate a string (a name) inside some HL7 log files in a directory. Findstr was getting 0 results, but Find returned plenty. I played around with the syntax of my findstr command, but couldn't get it to return a result. Note, as these are HL7 files, the name is surrounded by symbols (|, ^, etc.):

D:\logs>findstr /l /m /c:"Test" *.*

D:\logs>

I assume the lack of output means 0 results. Meanwhile:

D:\logs>find /c "Test" *.*

---------- LOG1.LOG: 0

---------- LOG2.LOG: 4

---------- LOG3.LOG: 0

---------- LOG4.LOG: 0

---------- LOG5.LOG: 8

---------- LOG6.LOG: 0

---------- LOG7.LOG: 18

So there are plenty of results. Why didn't Findstr find any files?

Keen

Posted 2012-08-17T20:27:14.197

Reputation: 898

Can you post a sample of the log file so that I can reproduce? – djangofan – 2012-08-17T20:47:10.037

@djangofan I'm having issues ginning up fake files for some reason. Making a small text file with the bare minimum of what I think is a sufficient simulation (e.g. "|Test^Foo") ends up working with findstr. – Keen – 2012-08-17T21:12:51.670

I think with those special characters, like '^', you need to enable delayed expansion in your script. This script is an example I made that uses both FIND and FINDSTR.exe : http://thegreenoak.blogspot.com/2012/01/dos-batch-script-to-edit-property-files.html .

– djangofan – 2012-08-20T17:34:00.697

No answers