Unix/Linux find and sort by date modified

152

50

How can I do a simple find which would order the results by most recently modified?

Here is the current find I am using (I am doing a shell escape in PHP, so that is the reasoning for the variables):

find '$dir' -name '$str'\* -print | head -10

How could I have this order the search by most recently modified? (Note I do not want it to sort 'after' the search, but rather find the results based on what was most recently modified.)

Richard Easton

Posted 2011-06-07T18:23:57.763

Reputation:

https://github.com/shadkam/recentmost/ would do what is desired - but one needs to build it – user3392225 – 2014-03-07T13:50:08.750

Answers

168

Use this:

find . -printf "%T@ %Tc %p\n" | sort -n

printf arguments from man find:

  • %Tk: File's last modification time in the format specified by k.

  • @: seconds since Jan. 1, 1970, 00:00 GMT, with fractional part.

  • c: locale's date and time (Sat Nov 04 12:02:33 EST 1989).

  • %p: File's name.

user195696

Posted 2011-06-07T18:23:57.763

Reputation: 1 681

most reliable (and very simple) as the time is granted to be numerically sequential (therefore always properly sortable), thx! – Aquarius Power – 2014-10-26T01:31:54.163

2I have this alias for finding recent files in my ~/.zshrc: fr () { find ./ -iname "*"$@"*" -printf "%T@ %Td-%Tb-%TY %Tk:%TM %p\n" | sort -n | cut -d " " -f 2- | grep -i "$@" ; } It recursively finds all files containing the pattern of the first argument passed to the command (fr <pattern>) and sorts them with the most recent one last. – joelostblom – 2016-10-27T23:01:09.677

This is great !!! To use with symlinks, use find -L ... – Varun Chandak – 2019-01-21T09:49:09.240

1You may want to use ssed to get rid of the seconds fractional part and stil use ISO8601 as @PeterMortensen showed : find . -type f -printf "%TY-%Tm-%TdT%TT %p\n" | sort -r | ssed -R 's/^([^.]+)\.\d+ (.*)$/\1 \2/' – Ludovic Kuty – 2019-01-31T08:51:26.847

@joelostblom JFYI, instead of cut -d " " -f 2- you may want to use cut -d " " -f 1 --complement but it is longer. – Ludovic Kuty – 2019-01-31T08:52:48.167

For ISO 8601 date output with *time zone information, use find . -printf "%TY-%Tm-%TdT%TT %TZ %p\n". As it sorts naturally, it can also, like the Unix time in this answer, be used directly in the sort: find . -printf "%TY-%Tm-%TdT%TT %TZ %p\n" | sort -n. Note that the date information is not in ISO 8601 format (e.g. "CEDT" - Central European Daylight Time). (My original comment (now deleted) had a number of flaws, in particular the use of the access time instead of the modification time.*)

– Peter Mortensen – 2019-04-17T14:19:53.360

5+1 Very useful, the first answer to this I have found with a readable/useful date output – Jake N – 2013-06-26T13:48:02.537

85

The easiest method is to use zsh, thanks to its glob qualifiers.

print -lr -- $dir/**/$str*(om[1,10])

If you have GNU find, make it print the file modification times and sort by that.

find -type f -printf '%T@ %p\0' |
sort -zk 1nr |
sed -z 's/^[^ ]* //' | tr '\0' '\n' | head -n 10

If you have GNU find but not other GNU utilities, use newlines as separators instead of nulls; you'll lose support for filenames containing newlines.

find -type f -printf '%T@ %p\n' |
sort -k 1nr |
sed 's/^[^ ]* //' | head -n 10

If you have Perl (here I'll assume there are no newlines in file names):

find . -type f -print |
perl -l -ne '
    $_{$_} = -M;  # store file age (mtime - now)
    END {
        $,="\n";
        @sorted = sort {$_{$a} <=> $_{$b}} keys %_;  # sort by increasing age
        print @sorted[0..9];
    }'

If you have Python (also assuming no newlines in file names):

find . -type f -print |
python -c 'import os, sys; times = {}
for f in sys.stdin.readlines(): f = f[0:-1]; times[f] = os.stat(f).st_mtime
for f in (sorted(times.iterkeys(), key=lambda f:times[f], reverse=True))[:10]: print f'

There's probably a way to do the same in PHP, but I don't know it.

If you want to work with only POSIX tools, it's rather more complicated; see How to list files sorted by modification date recursively (no stat command available!) (retatining the first 10 is the easy part).

Gilles 'SO- stop being evil'

Posted 2011-06-07T18:23:57.763

Reputation: 58 319

My sed says it doesn't have a -z option. – Kef Schecter – 2015-07-15T04:38:40.743

1@KefSchecter Then use newlines as separators, but you'll lose support for newlines in file names. – Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' – 2015-07-15T08:15:30.533

The above is for python2. If you only have python3, some small changes: python3 -c 'import os, sys; times = {} for f in sys.stdin.readlines(): f = f[0:-1]; times[f] = os.stat(f).st_mtime for f in (sorted(times.keys(), key=lambda f:times[f], reverse=True))[:10]: print(f);' – Neil McGill – 2017-12-12T15:33:32.207

I think the find version shows the oldest files, and that you need to add the -r option to sort. – Quentin Pradet – 2012-09-07T06:56:41.203

41

You don't need to PHP or Python, just ls:

man ls:
-t     sort by modification time
-r,    reverse order while sorting (--reverse )
-1     list one file per line

find /wherever/your/files/hide -type f -exec ls -1rt "{}" +;

If command * exits with a failure status (ie Argument list too long), then you can iterate with find. Paraphrased from: The maximum length of arguments for a new process

  • find . -print0|xargs -0 command (optimizes speed, if find doesn't implement "-exec +" but knows "-print0")
  • find . -print|xargs command (if there's no white space in the arguments)

If the major part of the arguments consists of long, absolute or relative paths, then try to move your actions into the directory: cd /directory/with/long/path; command * And another quick fix may be to match fewer arguments: command [a-e]*; command [f-m]*; ...

Ярослав Рахматуллин

Posted 2011-06-07T18:23:57.763

Reputation: 9 076

2ls doesn't quote file names in a way xargs can understand (no -0 option, and the various quote styles are inadequate) – Tobu – 2014-11-08T23:13:26.900

2If there are a lot of files, this fails with 'Argument list too long' on the ls. – occulus – 2012-09-03T08:41:54.603

1That's true, but I believe the question was "how do I do a simple find..." – Ярослав Рахматуллин – 2012-09-03T10:53:40.423

10

You do only need ls

You could do find /wherever/your/files/hide -type f -exec ls -1rt "{}" +; as stated above,

or

ls -1rt `find /wherever/your/file/hides -type f`

skippy1910

Posted 2011-06-07T18:23:57.763

Reputation: 117

3But if xargs calls ls multiple times, the sort will be broken. – Aaron D. Marasco – 2015-11-02T17:48:43.390

This fails for files with spaces in their names. Any advice? – user74094 – 2018-01-19T14:16:06.580

Just stumbled upon this answer and it was exactly what I needed in a similar situation. Question: what does the +; at the end do? It seems to give the same result without the ; however it does not work without the + ? – RocketNuts – 2019-03-21T23:36:52.523

This is just the same as another answer posted 8 months before, except for the part about using "ls -1rt `find …`", which is broken – Clément – 2019-04-13T19:16:07.373

3If there are a lot of files, this fails with 'Argument list too long' on the ls. Maybe recook to use xargs? – occulus – 2012-09-03T08:41:24.307

8

Extending user195696's answer:

find . -type f -printf "%T@\t%Tc %6k KiB %p\n" | sort -n | cut -f 2-

For each file, this first outputs the numeric timestamp (for sorting by, followed by tabulation \t), then a human-readable timestamp, then the filesize (unfortunately find's -printf can't do in mebibytes, only kibibytes), then the filename with relative path.

Then sort -n sorts it by the first numeric field.

Then cut gets rid of that first numeric field which is of no interest to the user. (Prints second field onward.) The default field separator is \t or tabulation.

Example of output:

Thu 06 Feb 2014 04:49:14 PM EST     64 KiB ./057_h2_f7_10/h2_f7_10.class
Fri 07 Feb 2014 02:08:30 AM EST 7962976 KiB ./056_h2_f7_400/h2__rh_4e-4.mph
Fri 07 Feb 2014 02:23:24 AM EST 7962976 KiB ./056_h2_f7_400/h2_f7_400_out_Model.mph
Fri 07 Feb 2014 02:23:24 AM EST      0 KiB ./056_h2_f7_400/h2_f7_400_out.mph.status
Fri 07 Feb 2014 02:23:24 AM EST     64 KiB ./056_h2_f7_400/1579678.out
Fri 07 Feb 2014 03:47:31 AM EST 8132224 KiB ./057_h2_f7_10/h2__rh_1e-5.mph
Fri 07 Feb 2014 04:00:49 AM EST 8132224 KiB ./057_h2_f7_10/h2_f7_10_out_Model.mph
Fri 07 Feb 2014 04:00:49 AM EST      0 KiB ./057_h2_f7_10/h2_f7_10_out.mph.status
Fri 07 Feb 2014 04:00:49 AM EST     64 KiB ./057_h2_f7_10/1579679.out
Fri 07 Feb 2014 09:47:18 AM EST   9280 KiB ./056_h2_f7_400/h2__rh_4e-4.mat
Fri 07 Feb 2014 10:51:23 AM EST   9728 KiB ./018_bidomain/h2_plain__rh_1e-5.mat
Fri 07 Feb 2014 10:58:33 AM EST   9568 KiB ./057_h2_f7_10/h2__rh_1e-5.mat
Fri 07 Feb 2014 05:05:38 PM EST     64 KiB ./058_h2_f7_stationary/h2_f7_stationary.java
Fri 07 Feb 2014 06:06:29 PM EST     32 KiB ./058_h2_f7_stationary/slurm.slurm
Sat 08 Feb 2014 03:42:07 AM EST      0 KiB ./058_h2_f7_stationary/1581061.err
Sat 08 Feb 2014 03:42:14 AM EST     64 KiB ./058_h2_f7_stationary/h2_f7_stationary.class
Sat 08 Feb 2014 03:58:28 AM EST  70016 KiB ./058_h2_f7_stationary/h2s__rh_1e-5.mph
Sat 08 Feb 2014 04:12:40 AM EST  70304 KiB ./058_h2_f7_stationary/h2s__rh_4e-4.mph
Sat 08 Feb 2014 04:12:53 AM EST  70304 KiB ./058_h2_f7_stationary/h2_f7_stationary_out_Model.mph
Sat 08 Feb 2014 04:12:53 AM EST      0 KiB ./058_h2_f7_stationary/h2_f7_stationary_out.mph.status
Sat 08 Feb 2014 04:12:53 AM EST     32 KiB ./058_h2_f7_stationary/1581061.out
Mon 10 Feb 2014 11:40:54 AM EST    224 KiB ./058_h2_f7_stationary/h2s__rh_4e-4.mat
Mon 10 Feb 2014 11:42:32 AM EST    224 KiB ./058_h2_f7_stationary/h2s__rh_1e-5.mat
Mon 10 Feb 2014 11:50:08 AM EST     32 KiB ./plot_grid.m

I deliberately made the filesize field 6 characters, because if making it longer, it becomes hard to visually distinguish how large the files are. This way, files larger than 1e6 KiB jut out: by 1 char means 1-9 GB, by 2 chars means 10-99 GB, etc.


Edit: here's another version (since find . -printf "%Tc" crashes on MinGW/MSYS):

find . -type f -printf "%T@\t%p\n" | sort -n | cut -f 2- | xargs -I{} ls -Glath --si {}

Giving output like:

-rw-r--r-- 1 es 23K Jul 10  2010 ./laptop_0000071.jpg
-rw-r--r-- 1 es 43M Jul 29 19:19 ./work.xcf
-rw-r--r-- 1 es 87K Jul 29 20:11 ./patent_lamps/US Patent 274427 Maxim Lamp Holder.jpg
-rw-r--r-- 1 es 151K Jul 29 20:12 ./patent_lamps/Edison screw-in socket.png
-rw-r--r-- 1 es 50K Jul 29 20:13 ./patent_lamps/1157 Lamp.jpg
-rw-r--r-- 1 es 38K Jul 29 20:14 ./patent_lamps/US06919684-20050719-D00001.png

Where:

  • -I{} causes the occurrence of {} to be replaced by an argument, and newlines are now the argument separators (note the spaces in filenames above).

  • ls -G suppresses printing the group name (waste of space).

  • ls -h --si produces human-readable file sizes (more correct with --si).

  • ls -t sorts by time, which is irrelevant here, but that's what I typically use.

Evgeni Sergeev

Posted 2011-06-07T18:23:57.763

Reputation: 1 704

1Note: to sort by file size instead, simply replace the T@ by s in either of the above commands. – Evgeni Sergeev – 2014-12-23T04:43:02.130

4

OS X variant of @user195696's answer:

  1. With timestamp:

    find . -type f -exec stat -f "%Sm %N" -t "%Y%y%m%d%H%M" {} \; | sort -r
    
  2. Without timestamp:

    find . -type f -exec stat -f "%Sm %N" -t "%Y%y%m%d%H%M" {} \; | sort -r | awk -F' ' '{ print substr($0, length($1) + 2) }'
    

user9399

Posted 2011-06-07T18:23:57.763

Reputation: 141

2

I have a simple solution that works for both FreeBSD (OS X) and Linux:

find . -type f -exec ls -t {} +

Alex Shchur

Posted 2011-06-07T18:23:57.763

Reputation: 121

This works perfectly - should be correct answer, or at least higher rated! – digitaltoast – 2019-06-14T08:13:06.473

find . -type f -exec ls -lat {} + gives you a better picture with date and time showing if somebody needs this format – jturi – 2020-02-11T14:21:57.640

2

I found that this gets the job done on Mac OS X (and generic enough to work on other Unixen as well):

find . -type f -ls | awk '{print $(NF-3), $(NF-2), $(NF-1), $NF}' | sort

Bryan Petty

Posted 2011-06-07T18:23:57.763

Reputation: 121

user195696's answer works for the Croatian setup (and others). – Peter Mortensen – 2016-12-27T14:13:25.437

2Sadly, this prints out localized month names on my Croatian setup, making sort incorrect. – Ivan Vučica – 2013-04-15T20:19:58.467

1

Try:

find '$dir' -name '$str'\* -print | xargs ls -tl | head -10

But it's also useful to filter data by -mmin/-mtime and -type.

Good.Dima

Posted 2011-06-07T18:23:57.763

Reputation:

1

Use:

find . -type f -mtime 0 -printf "[%TD %TI:%TM%Tp] %s %p\n" | sort -n | awk '{
    hum[1024**4]="TB"; hum[1024**3]="GB"; hum[1024**2]="MB"; hum[1024]="KB"; hum[0]="B";
    for (x=1024**4; x>=1024; x/=1024){
    if ($3>=x) { printf $1" "$2"\t%7.2f %s\t%s\n",$3/x,hum[x],$4;break }
    }}';

This command will sort files by modified date.

And display out like:

[12/05/13 03:10PM] 1.75 MB ./file.text
[12/06/13 11:52PM] 2.90 MB ./file2.mp4
[12/07/13 04:11PM] 4.88 MB ./file3.mp4
[12/07/13 09:17PM] 4.74 MB ./test.apk

Akash

Posted 2011-06-07T18:23:57.763

Reputation: 11

I improved this sript to handle whitespace in filenames, see http://superuser.com/a/777007/134532

– jan – 2014-07-04T14:59:28.527

1

If your find selection is very simple, you might be able to do without it, and just use ls:

ls -1 *.cc # -r -t optional

djc

Posted 2011-06-07T18:23:57.763

Reputation: 200

0

You can use stat on BSD and Linux (not on POSIX) in this fashion:

$ stat -f "%m%t%N" /[the dir]/* | sort -rn | cut -f2-

If you want to limit the number:

$ stat -f "%m%t%N" /[the dir]/* | sort -rn | head -[the number] | cut -f2-

drewk

Posted 2011-06-07T18:23:57.763

Reputation: 984

0

There is a clean and robust way of sort | head by date:

Using ls -l for pretty print

find . ! -type d -printf "%T@ %p\0" |
    sort -zrn |
    head -zn 10 |
    sed -z 's/^[0-9.]\+ //' |
    xargs -0 ls -lt

As a function:

findByDate() {
    local humansize=''
    [ "$1" = "-h" ] && humansize='h' && shift
    find . ${2:-! -type d} -printf "%T@ %p\0" |
        sort -zrn |
        head -zn ${1:--0} |
        sed -z 's/^[0-9.]\+ //' |
        xargs -0 ls -dlt${humansize}
}

This could by run with one or two argument, or even without:

Usage: findByDate [-h] [lines] [find options]

Sample:

findByDate

Will list all non directories sorted by date. Nota:

Even on big filesystem tree, as xargs recieve already sorted list, the file order stay correct, even if ls must be run many times.

findByDate -h 12

Will list 12 more recents non directories sorted by date, with size printed in human readable form

findByDate 42 '-type l'

Will list 42 more recents symlinks

findByDate -0 '( -type l -o -type b -o -type s -o -type c )'

Will list all symlinks, block devices, sockets and characters devices, sorted by date.

Inverting order

Replacing head by tail and change switch of sort and ls:

findByDate() {
    local humansize=''
    [ "$1" = "-h" ] && humansize='h' && shift
    find . ${2:-! -type d} -printf "%T@ %p\0" |
        sort -zn |
        tail -zn ${1:-+0} |
        sed -z 's/^[0-9.]\+ //' |
        xargs -0 ls -dltr${humansize}
}

Same function, same usage:

Usage: findByDate [-h] [lines] [find options]

F. Hauri

Posted 2011-06-07T18:23:57.763

Reputation: 1 394

0

I don't think find has any options to modify the output ordering. -mtime and -mmin will let you restrict the results to files that have been modified within a certain time window, but the output won't be sorted -- you'll have to do that yourself. GNU find has a -printf option that, among other things, will let you print the modification time of each file found (format strings %t or %Tk) ; that might help you sort the find output the way you wish.

Jim Lewis

Posted 2011-06-07T18:23:57.763

Reputation: 199

0

If you want to order all PNG files by time in $PWD:

This simple one-liner gives all the flexibility of regexp on find and on ls.

find $PWD -name "*.png" -print0 | xargs -0 ls -laht | less

john smith

Posted 2011-06-07T18:23:57.763

Reputation: 1

0

I improved Akashs answer by making the script handling whitespace in filenames correctly:

find . -type f -mtime 0 -printf ";[%TD %TI:%TM%Tp];%s;%p\n" | sort -n | awk -F ";" '{
    hum[1024**4]="TB"; hum[1024**3]="GB"; hum[1024**2]="MB"; hum[1024]="KB"; hum[0]="B";
    for (x=1024**4; x>=1024; x/=1024){
    if ($3>=x) { printf $1" "$2"\t%7.2f %s\t%s\n",$3/x,hum[x],$4;break }
    }}';

jan

Posted 2011-06-07T18:23:57.763

Reputation: 225

-1

If you just want to get a full path of each item you can write down like this.

 find FIND_ROOT -maxdepth 1 -type f -printf "%T@ %p\n" | sort -nr | head -10 | cut -d ' ' -f 2

Where
-printf "%T@ %p\n" for giving sorting criteria (date),
'sort -nr' for sorting by date,
head -10 for listing top 10 results,
cut -d ' ' -f 2 for cutting the leading timestamp on each line.

David Jung

Posted 2011-06-07T18:23:57.763

Reputation: 1

cut -d ' ' -f 2 will break if filenames contain spaces. – F. Hauri – 2019-09-11T08:34:11.793

-3

I have a simple solution.

After cd to a directory, use

find . -iname "*" -ls

sing

Posted 2011-06-07T18:23:57.763

Reputation: 1

1This doesn't sort by date modified. – DavidPostill – 2017-03-25T09:40:41.587