0
I have a Snort IDS running Ubuntu Server 16.04 with one physical ethernet interface (eno1). I have configured two virtual network interfaces using the eno1 interface: eno1:0 for the sniffing interface and eno1:1 for the management interface, which is configured with a static IP address. The problem I am experiencing is that only the management interface (eno1:1) is up, while the sniffing interface (eno1:0) is down as indicated in the below output of ifconfig:
eno1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr c4:34:6b:61:d1:b3
inet6 addr: fe80::c634:6bff:ac61:d1b3/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:28019 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1046 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:3471780 (3.4 MB) TX bytes:116452 (116.4 KB)
Interrupt:20 Memory:f7c00000-f7c20000
eno1:1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr c4:34:6b:61:d1:b3
inet addr:192.168.1.154 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
Interrupt:20 Memory:f7c00000-f7c20000
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:65536 Metric:1
RX packets:162 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:162 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1
RX bytes:12020 (12.0 KB) TX bytes:12020 (12.0 KB)
Below are the settings for both the sniffing and management interfaces contained in /etc/network/interfaces:
# sniffer interface
auto eno1:0
iface eno1:0 inet manual
up ifconfig $IFACE 0.0.0.0 up
up ip link set $IFACE promisc on
down ip link set $IFACE promisc off
down ifconfig $IFACE down
post-up ethtool -K eno1:0 gro off
post-up ethtool -K eno1:0 lro off
# management interface
auto eno1:1
iface eno1:1 inet static
address 192.168.1.154
netmask 255.255.255.0
broadcast 192.168.1.255
gateway 192.168.1.2
dns-nameservers 1.1.1.1
The configuration settings for the sniffing interface have been used from this link, but the sniffing interface does not go up. What could be the problem?
With regards to only using eno1, that is the current setting and it works. Reason for using two virtual interfaces was to follow the best practice of separating the management interface from the sniffing interface. – synthesis – 2018-06-19T09:24:47.780
To my knowledge, it's not possible to split a single physical interface into virtual interfaces this way. Either the interface is promiscuous, or it is not. (Though you could e.g. use a MACVLAN, but then it will have a different MAC address, should the process using it decide to send packets instead of just receiving them, so it's more like two different interfaces on the same LAN segment, and not like a normal interface and a sniffing interface). But I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong. :-) – dirkt – 2018-06-19T09:33:33.663