1
We use Exchange 2013 + Outlook 2013.
Currently, all of our users have their own separate calendar in which they plan appointments.
Due to the amount of employees, we would like to create a central calendar and make it so whenever a user plans an appointment in their own calendar this appointment gets duplicated/copied/synchronized to the central calendar.
This way our reception will only need to check one calendar to know which appointments to expect.
Does anyone know whether this is possible?
Thanks for your response BastianW. I would like to automate the whole process. I cannot expect my users to add a specific room resource, or invite a taskuser for every appointment they make. One can dream but I highly doubt all users are capable of upholding such a system. – Kevv – 2017-08-29T07:23:25.257
I see. You might wish to combine the room approach above with an adjusted and changed Form (see here). However this also might cause some issues so a propper training for your users would be the best I assume. Additional the approach above will also work via ActiveSync the change in the form not. [Oh and please accept this answer here or at least upvote it if helpfull for you]
– BastianW – 2017-08-29T08:33:29.067Hey BastianW, Maybe you're right about the proper training. I'm not sure whether it'll be upheld but I'll throw it in the group for discussion. Thanks for the help! – Kevv – 2017-08-29T13:30:24.100
I think that a training would be the best option here. I mean a resource mailbox is such a big useful feature that once the users understand that I´m very sure they will pick that up on there own (as they can check itself if a room is free when they book a meeting for example). – BastianW – 2017-08-29T15:45:25.143
Just as an idea (not tested yet). You might also come up with a fancy script using New-MailboxSearch (running every x min) and then store the results in a 2nd mailbox (your shared combined calendar). But I personally think this isn´t error free and required a lot of work to implement that so that it is working as expected. – BastianW – 2017-08-30T07:09:19.000