2
If I have a GPG file that's passphrase protected, with no key, is it still encrypted? (It was hard to google for an answer to that question). A guy on answers.yahoo.com said it's not. So... what's the point of the passphrase? I don't get it.
From what I've read, GPG permits either a passphrase, or a key file, but the two are mutually exclusive right? You can't have both the key file and a passphrase?
Anyway, I read up on this a lot and I can't get a grasp on that. - If you can tell me that a passphrase alone provides encryption that's fine, thanks.
Thank you- yes, like I said, I tried looking at the docs. (for about an hour)- actually I used this:
https://www.gnupg.org/documentation/manuals/gnupg/
Like, I said, the needle is probably in that haystack somewhere, and all of the google searches I did focussed on keys and things like programmatic automation, or email, which is one of it's biggest uses but that doesn't apply to me.
Anyway, I tried my best to RTFM as a programmer for 18 years, but some things elude google or the needle-in-the haystack of masses of documentation.
Thanks much, for a definitive answer, thanks.
@Mike: For the part of that manual that is about the gpg program rather than the rest of the suite, the section headings match the gpg man page and the relevant one is
4.1.2 Commands to select the type of operation
. Your Q didn't say what doc you looked in, only 'some guy on answers.yahoo' wnich is not a sufficient citation to verify easily or with any confidence. Cheers. – dave_thompson_085 – 2016-12-12T08:31:00.220Thanks, nonetheless your pointing out to me that "As a general rule, information about a program is very often contained in the documentation for that program; that is in fact the reason documentation is created." Implies that I didn't read any documentation at all, which I had already said I did in the question, and it implies that I don't understand that documentation for a program is made to be read. Cheers. – Mike – 2016-12-12T16:51:14.483