1
I find every few years I re-install windows on my PC for one reason or another eg. I install something which updates the registry and by the time I discover an issue it is too late to roll back.
I can fiddle with fixes but usually after some years it is cleaner to wipe it all and start up again.
For this reason I always partition my disk into 2, C: for Windows and D: for all my own stuff.
But when I re-install, as I've lost the original registry I also need to re-install all my games etc as well (and then pop the save games back from backup).
So it occurred to me, why not install windows on both drives, the D: windows would be passive, except when I install a game - then I boot up on D:, install the game, then reboot on C: again. For windows-related stuff I install on C: and if there is a deep late issue I re-install. Games rarely produce a windows related problem so I would rarely need to re-install on D:.
Now the question is, if you boot on D: and install, then boot on C:, would the game look in the D: windows' registry? Would it work?
2This is a lovely answer to an awful question - but wouldn't the 'real fix' be to either a) not bugger it up in the first place, or b) have backups? ;) – Tetsujin – 2016-08-27T17:34:42.363
@Tetsujin I don't think so. At least, not the backup part. Its about the hastle of having to setup your windows after a reinstall, and making it as painless as possible. I know the techniques as slipstreaming etc, but they only work for one windows install and stop working the moment you want to upgrade to a new install. So I found it works best if most programs are portable or can be installed through one install. – LPChip – 2016-08-27T17:38:00.633
You're probably right. I have to admit to a Mac-bias on this; so it's something I've only ever had to contend with on Windows, with its monolithic registry. – Tetsujin – 2016-08-27T17:40:04.270
Thanks so much for the great answer, LPChip - very kind of you and great advice!! Thanks. – user634796 – 2016-08-28T23:42:39.557
BTW Tetsujin I find lightly given insults very annoying these days. It's not an awful question at all. The idea that apps/games can be independent from Windows' own internal workings is obvious and sensible. MS allow - no, encourage, expect, design for - 3rd parties to integrate with the OS and then have no end of trouble trying to get them out again (eg root kit viruses that take over low level disk reading functions so that even Windows does not know they are there). Why not have an OS citadel and then only allow layer integrations on top of that? – user634796 – 2016-08-28T23:52:40.293
Even the presumption that I want Windows all over my C: drive is OS-centric. The OS is just an engine and should be tucked under the bonnet, ie. in C:\Windows, end of story. Similarly user account separation is a separate issue from OS engine workings and there should be different, non-integrated solutions for that. I don't mind if you can't see my vision on this and I may even be way off base but there is never a need to condescendingly call a question 'awful'. Thank you. – user634796 – 2016-08-28T23:58:00.877