0
Why would a ipaddress not show up in foreign address when I do netstat -atp tcp
?
Here is a list of my foreign address that are not showing up. How can I find out where they are going to?
Proto Local Address Foreign Address State Offload State
TCP 192.168.0.184:58137 server3005:5938 ESTABLISHED InHost
TCP 192.168.0.184:58142 bn3sch020010558:https ESTABLISHED InHost
TCP 192.168.0.184:58204 HPD89D67DFAC36:8080 ESTABLISHED InHost
TCP 192.168.0.184:58245 ou-in-f188:5228 ESTABLISHED InHost
TCP 192.168.0.184:58398 HPD89D67DFAC36:8080 ESTABLISHED InHost
TCP 192.168.0.184:58542 cache:https ESTABLISHED InHost
TCP 192.168.0.184:58544 234-255-73-208:http TIME_WAIT InHost
TCP 192.168.0.184:58545 a23-78-241-168:http TIME_WAIT InHost
TCP 192.168.0.184:58547 yts2:https ESTABLISHED InHost
TCP 192.168.0.184:58548 234-255-73-208:http ESTABLISHED InHost
What do you mean the address is not showing up? Are you looking for the results that the
-n
switch will give you (netstat -antp tcp
)? – heavyd – 2015-12-14T18:16:22.343Who is 234-255-73-208? or HPD89D67DFAC36? or bn3sch020010558? I want to find out what that connection is. – Whitecat – 2015-12-14T18:17:35.410
Then yes,
-n
is your friend. – heavyd – 2015-12-14T18:19:15.323The correct answer is to issue
netcat -natp
. This will prevent name resolution, and you will instead be shown normal IP addresses. – MariusMatutiae – 2015-12-14T18:19:21.383The problem then becomes if they do name resolution I loose the strange foreign addresses. – Whitecat – 2015-12-14T18:20:17.317
1well, with netstat you have to pick one or the other: numeric output, or resolved. you can't have both. – Frank Thomas – 2015-12-14T18:22:18.320
When ever I do
netstat -antp tcp
any connection with port585**
disappears. – Whitecat – 2015-12-14T18:22:53.023This goes on to another question how do I find out what process is running the connections? I am running this on windows CMD. – Whitecat – 2015-12-14T18:25:00.807
-o
displays the owning PID.netstat /?
will display all of the switches – heavyd – 2015-12-14T18:25:53.653If you're looking for a bit more advanced/easier to use monitor take a look at TCPView from SysInternals, which is now Microsoft.
– heavyd – 2015-12-14T18:28:18.493