It might make a little more sense to look at why you can't compress it further.
In an oversimplified statement, compression would work like this:
Document Pre-Compression (110 Characters):
this is a document that has not been compressed. After this document is compressed the length will be shorter.
Same document, Post Compression (103 Characters):
1:this
2:document
3:compressed
1 is a 2 that has not been 3. After 1 2 is 3 the length will be shorter.
In this particular example, a moderate level of compression is applied, if you had more time (computer power) to count occurrences of words, you could increase the compression of this statement by pulling out the word "is". But even large amounts of CPU time can only compress documents a fraction further, leaps from 110 MB to 22 MB aren't possible unless there are a lot of things to replace in the first compression pass..
2if all compressed file can be compressed again to reduce its size then we don't need storage at all since the size will become 0 eventually – phuclv – 2014-06-24T15:50:32.910
1As a real-world analogy, astronauts recycle their urine, and animals often eat what they've ahem already digested, but there is a limit to this imposed by (possibly geometrically/exponentially) diminishing returns -- otherwise, why would anything or anyone ever starve? In other words, entropy (not exclusively the Kolmogorov kind, which is especially apropos to file compression, but the (admittedly related) physical kind too) wins. – Vandermonde – 2015-12-14T07:27:53.160
What kind of data does the ISO file contain? Programs? Documents? Music? Video? – David Schwartz – 2012-03-31T06:55:47.683
@ David Schwartz It is a software CD,with autorun – Suhail Gupta – 2012-03-31T07:00:08.147
2It would be nice if we could compress compressed archives again and again. Every archive would be about 1 byte. – totymedli – 2013-05-01T08:19:22.623