There are roughly four levels of portability for shell scripts (as far as the shebang line is concerned):
Most portable: use a #!/bin/sh
shebang and use only the basic shell syntax specified in the POSIX standard. This should work on pretty much any POSIX/unix/linux system. (Well, except Solaris 10 and earlier which had the real legacy Bourne shell, predating POSIX so non compliant, as /bin/sh
.)
Second most portable: use a #!/bin/bash
(or #!/usr/bin/env bash
) shebang line, and stick to bash v3 features. This'll work on any system that has bash (in the expected location).
Third most portable: use a #!/bin/bash
(or #!/usr/bin/env bash
) shebang line, and use bash v4 features. This'll fail on any system that has bash v3 (e.g. macOS, which has to use it for licensing reasons).
Least portable: use a #!/bin/sh
shebang and use bash extensions to the POSIX shell syntax. This will fail on any system that has something other than bash for /bin/sh (such as recent Ubuntu versions). Don't ever do this; it's not just a compatibility issue, it's just plain wrong. Unfortunately, it's an error a lot of people make.
My recommendation: use the most conservative of the first three that supplies all of the shell features that you need for the script. For max portability, use option #1, but in my experience some bash features (like arrays) are helpful enough that I'll go with #2.
The worst thing you can do is #4, using the wrong shebang. If you're not sure what features are basic POSIX and which are bash extensions, either stick with a bash shebang (i.e. option #2), or test the script thoroughly with a very basic shell (like dash on your Ubuntu LTS servers). The Ubuntu wiki has a good list of bashisms to watch out for.
There's some very good info about the history and differences between shells in the Unix & Linux question "What does it mean to be sh compatible?" and the Stackoverflow question "Difference between sh and bash".
Also, be aware that the shell isn't the only thing that differs between different systems; if you're used to linux, you're used to the GNU commands, which have a lot of nonstandard extensions you may not find on other unix systems (e.g. bsd, macOS). Unfortunately, there's no simple rule here, you just have to know the range of variation for the commands you're using.
One of the nastiest commands in terms of portability is one of the most basic: echo
. Any time you use it with any options (e.g. echo -n
or echo -e
), or with any escapes (backslashes) in the string to print, different versions will do different things. Any time you want to print a string without a linefeed after it, or with escapes in the string, use printf
instead (and learn how it works -- it's more complicated than echo
is). The ps
command is also a mess.
Another general thing-to-watch-for is recent/GNUish extensions to command option syntax: old (standard) command format is that the command is followed by options (with a single dash, and each option is a single letter), followed by command arguments. Recent (and often non-portable) variants include long options (usually introduced with --
), allowing options to come after arguments, and using --
to separate options from arguments.