41

A .deb package I am releasing expects that it can call lsb_release. One customer using Debian 6.0.5 indicated that the lsb_release command (even in the terminal) produces a command not found error. Is this standard or is there something wrong with his Debian build?

UsAaR33
  • 1,036
  • 3
  • 11
  • 20

2 Answers2

41

There is an lsb-release package that supplies the lsb_release command. This is separate from the lsb, lsb-base, and lsb-core packages. None of the lsb packages are essential. So if your package needs lsb_release it should specify that it depends on lsb-release.

Bribles
  • 934
  • 5
  • 11
  • 9
    Take care on proper naming: the package name `lsb-release` has a dash, but the `lsb_release` command has an underscore. – Doka Dec 30 '13 at 12:39
34

Not all Debian builds have lsb_release. For example, even the official Ubuntu Docker image does not have lsb_release.

The alternative is to use cat /etc/os-release.

wisbucky
  • 969
  • 9
  • 9