Are they synonyms, or components of a protocol stack? Answers with proof links are welcome.
Asked
Active
Viewed 1,047 times
2 Answers
5
CIFS is an implementation of SMB. For all intents and purposes they are the same thing.
user9517
- 114,104
- 20
- 206
- 289
-
from the first link it appears that SMB to CIFS is like SUN-RPC for NFS; while the second one puts them in a row. What do I miss? – yrk Mar 01 '12 at 14:05
3
They're pretty much the same.
According to Wikipedia, they are the same.
According to Microsoft, CIFS is a dialect of SMB.
T. Fabre
- 220
- 2
- 13
-
Thanks. It appears CIFS is a specialisation of SMB, just like RDP is a narrow specialisation of GSS/MCS stack (T.120). Is it close? – yrk Mar 01 '12 at 14:11
-
[MS-SMB](http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc246232(v=prot.10).aspx) puts them another way: SMB is an extention of CIFS... so where's the truth? – yrk Mar 01 '12 at 14:18
-
2The truth is most likely [here](http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-heizer-cifs-v1-spec-00) :) Which is that CIFS is "based on SMB". – T. Fabre Mar 01 '12 at 14:26
-
Or even better, [here](http://ubiqx.org/cifs/rfc-draft/index.html) or [there](http://www.cifs.org) – T. Fabre Mar 01 '12 at 14:34
-