I am in the process of trying to optimize the boot process of our 700 Windows XP workstations, we regularly have complaints about the start-up and login times on site workstations.
Looking at this in two parts, part one using BootVis to monitor and inspect the boot process; part two using Process Monitor to monitor the login process. Using BootVis' "Boot Done" way point as the metric, I utilized a VMWare workstation virtual machine that has been used for about 18 months as a general purpose testing machine (thus fairly typical of on site machines). I used a snapshot to return the Virtual Machine to the initial state before each test.
From the logs and report that BootVis created the most obvious delay was from Sophos Anti-Virus on access scanner, followed at some distance by mrxsmb. I tweaked with the policies for the machine (ensuring I forced Sophos to update twice each time) and came up with the following numbers:
- Scan All Files, On Read: 260 seconds
- Scan All Files, On Write: 160 seconds
- Scan Executables, On Read and On Write: 111 seconds
- Scan Executables, On Read: 99 seconds
- Scan Executables, On Write: 95 seconds
- On-Access Scanning Disabled: 102 seconds
The above tends to suggest that Scanning All Files, On Read is by far the most expensive operation (and probably totally unnecessary). I can't quite comprehend why disabling on-access scanning actually slows down the boot sequence however fractionally fractionally. The final three results are pretty much the same, which means I must use other factors to influence my decision as to selecting Scan Executables, On Read or On Write.
Update:
I did some more tests, on the same virtual machine (at a different time of day, so they can not be compared directly with the above results:
- Sophos Not Installed: 67.4 seconds (average over 5 tests)
- Scan Executables, On Read: 84.5 seconds (average over 5 tests)
- Scan Executables, On Write: 85 seconds (average over 5 tests)
The averaging causes the values for On Read and On Write to converge further, it is interesting to see that using Sophos scan Executable Files only adds a 21% performance overhead over Sophos not being installed.
So what other considerations should I make when configuring On-Access scanning to improve the boot time?