Arthis
February 9th, 2003, 07:13 AM
The EMP weapon is one of the most powerful tools someone can dream about, in order to put anarchy or so without causing any casualties.
End of the introduction.
I found a few link about EMP: <a href="http://www.eskimo.com/~bilb/freenrg/empweap.html" target="_blank">http://www.eskimo.com/~bilb/freenrg/empweap.html</a> ,
<a href="http://www.fas.org/irp/threat/mctl98-2/p2sec06.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.fas.org/irp/threat/mctl98-2/p2sec06.pdf</a> that may be interesting.
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica"> A commercial 100 kV DC power supply was used to charge the 20-stage Marx,
where it charged its capacitors in parallel, and then via a series of
spark gaps discharged them in series. With the power supply set to 27 kV,
the Marx would output a 265 kV, 3500 ampere, 21.4-nanosecond pulse </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">This seems to be a good EMP device, but then a few questions come to my mind: such a generator should deliver a very high pulse, considered that atomic bombs deliver a pulse of 100 kV (if I remember well). Later in the text, it's said that they managed to destroy computers... Considering that they made the experiments on the ground, I understand that the range of the experiment was not really wide.
A very wide range can be reached with a HEMP (High-altitude EMP), between 20-40 km. It would be able to reach, if launched in the middle of the USA, the whole North America. The curve of the Earth is reducing the range of ground-based explosions, but considering that EMP is a electromagnetic field, it should be able to "curv" itself, with interferometry for example, as the pulse produced is so fast that the source can be considered as coherent.
The fact that the pulse delivered by the marx generator is long (21.4 ns) compared to those emitted by better systems (~10ns), and very long compared to the one delivered by nuclear weapons (~a few ns, basically 1 ns) may be one point to be taken into account.
Another point I was wondering about is the physical aspect of the pulse. The pulse is a electromagnetic wave, but its generated by excited electrons hit by photons. Are the electrons also moving (I know they are not part of the pure EM wave) allowing the device to have an exponential effect in its area of detonation ?
Finally, such a device would be a really great stuff for anyone: think about what you can do with. You can destroy communications, then attack a place, or it may allow to pose bombs without being recorded by cameras, and it may turn a city into anarchy: imagine new-york without electricity: I doubt many systems are protected against EMP. (Maybe I should have seen Ocean's Eleven twice: it gives me bad ideas, though I knew the system well before).
End of the introduction.
I found a few link about EMP: <a href="http://www.eskimo.com/~bilb/freenrg/empweap.html" target="_blank">http://www.eskimo.com/~bilb/freenrg/empweap.html</a> ,
<a href="http://www.fas.org/irp/threat/mctl98-2/p2sec06.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.fas.org/irp/threat/mctl98-2/p2sec06.pdf</a> that may be interesting.
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica"> A commercial 100 kV DC power supply was used to charge the 20-stage Marx,
where it charged its capacitors in parallel, and then via a series of
spark gaps discharged them in series. With the power supply set to 27 kV,
the Marx would output a 265 kV, 3500 ampere, 21.4-nanosecond pulse </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">This seems to be a good EMP device, but then a few questions come to my mind: such a generator should deliver a very high pulse, considered that atomic bombs deliver a pulse of 100 kV (if I remember well). Later in the text, it's said that they managed to destroy computers... Considering that they made the experiments on the ground, I understand that the range of the experiment was not really wide.
A very wide range can be reached with a HEMP (High-altitude EMP), between 20-40 km. It would be able to reach, if launched in the middle of the USA, the whole North America. The curve of the Earth is reducing the range of ground-based explosions, but considering that EMP is a electromagnetic field, it should be able to "curv" itself, with interferometry for example, as the pulse produced is so fast that the source can be considered as coherent.
The fact that the pulse delivered by the marx generator is long (21.4 ns) compared to those emitted by better systems (~10ns), and very long compared to the one delivered by nuclear weapons (~a few ns, basically 1 ns) may be one point to be taken into account.
Another point I was wondering about is the physical aspect of the pulse. The pulse is a electromagnetic wave, but its generated by excited electrons hit by photons. Are the electrons also moving (I know they are not part of the pure EM wave) allowing the device to have an exponential effect in its area of detonation ?
Finally, such a device would be a really great stuff for anyone: think about what you can do with. You can destroy communications, then attack a place, or it may allow to pose bombs without being recorded by cameras, and it may turn a city into anarchy: imagine new-york without electricity: I doubt many systems are protected against EMP. (Maybe I should have seen Ocean's Eleven twice: it gives me bad ideas, though I knew the system well before).